Full HD 1920*1080 borderless and settings in Ultra custom : Motion blur and Bloom deactivated.Originally Posted by ghstbstr Go to original post
Gonna change in a few month for a AMD Rysen5 3600.
I have played most of those at 1440p 60fps maxed out and I see nothing new that would justify a 1080ti.Originally Posted by digsgravy Go to original post
I don't need to lie. I played some of those at 1440 with a RX 580 with settings turned down. My Vega had 0 problems with those at 1440.Originally Posted by digsgravy Go to original post
Possibly on some of the less demanding titles which I listed, most definitely not, I've seen enough reviews and built a number of my own systems to know your skewing to save your argument.
This thread if you go through it and look at results is contrary to what your claiming.
Just post anything ..any game listed, 2 min clip with a fps on it, go through the settings maxed and lets see..
I will give one piece of advice, that will do you well in life, do not practice in self deception as your only fooling yourself.
Look here....notice most the games lower than 60 fps are ubi games.Originally Posted by digsgravy Go to original post
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/d...enchmarks-7001
Let me help you out here.
Assassins Creed Odyssey Ultra 1440p 41fps
Assassins Creed Unity Ultra 1440p 40fps
Battlefield 1 Ultra 1440p 105fps
Crysis 3 1440p 74fps
Wildlands 1440p 41fps
Rise of the tomb raider 1440p 110fps
Shadow of the tomb raider 1440p 52fps
Witcher 3 1440p 74fps
Witcher 3 and Crysis were both on your list.
1st Eurogamer shills for AMD, so expect results to be favorable towards AMD.
2nd the argument is not whether these cards can run some games at 1440p, the argument is that with an older generation cpus, its not suitable for 1440p in most AAA titles paired with cards like the 1070 and similar perf. And that its not isolated to UBI games.
3rd your claiming, your magical rig can run all games @1440p 60fps+ maxed out and that the 1080ti is not needed for 1440p. Which is utter nonsense.
But even with this skewed biased, however thorough review, ( I like the graphs and charts ) It backs up what I said.
Keep in mind many of the games in this review are not maxed out in settings, exactly how I called it to get a playable 1440p perf and most still drop to 40's and 50's with 1% lows, exactly what I stated.
And the cpu was not mentioned so it was probably an 8700k or 9700k or even a 9900k which means the chipset, mem and cpu will see a considerable higher mins, avgs and highs (looking at the water and sky in a corner) . Laughs in intel.
So lets start with the two games you brought up; "Witcher 3 and Crysis"
Witcher 3
If we look at the overall frame rate and look at the lowest 1%
Vega 56 | 1440p 61.6 fps
Vega 64 | 1440p 61.7 fps
GTX 1070 | 1440p 59 fps
GTX 1070ti | 1440p 66.3 fps
GTX 2060 | 1440p 65.4 fps
Oh I guess Ohnoozer proved his point, I was wrong, of course not don't be foolish. The settings say ultra 1440p with Post AA and Hairworks off.
I play with hairworks on, always have in witcher 3, I want to see Geralt's flowing hair This is what I pay for and this is maxed settings. Pretty sure Post AA is the cheap AA choice too, which is not as clean and less overhead.
Either way just with Hairworks on, now the fps overall of 1% lows (which is an average) Would look like this:
Vega 56 | 1440p 51.6 fps
Vega 64 | 1440p 51.7 fps
GTX 1070 | 1440p 54 fps
GTX 1070ti | 1440p 59.3 fps
GTX 2060 | 1440p 59.4 fps
And know what, I played witcher 3 alot on highend rigs on a 1080ti and there are moments where it would drop to under 60 fps maxed out, so these cards would hit 45 48 fps % lows. And keep in mind this is most likely with a newest generation cpu, not what your running or alot of people are complaining about in this thread, own.
Lets move on to Crysis 3, Very High, SMAA T2X,
*AA is all subjective based on preference , so choosing SMAA is fine, but its not the highest quality AA, there are two TXAA implementations which look better and of course are more taxing on a system. So the point this is the cheapest AA outside of no AA.
Vega 56 | 1440p 50.7 fps
Vega 64 | 1440p 53.7 fps
GTX 1070 | 1440p 47.5 fps
GTX 1070ti | 1440p 54.9 fps
GTX 2060 | 1440p 54.3 fps
Again this proves your claim is total BS. Because you what with an older cpu this would dip even more and the averages would be lower than reported by eurogamer.
And honestly these scores look to low for nvidia.
Thank you come again,