🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #141
    RaulO4's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,458
    Originally Posted by xxFratosxx Go to original post
    I’m surprised you don’t mind weight because adding weight is a negative thing for your character which you seem to be ok with but you made a big deal earlier like how weapons, gears and so on give negative stats in Breakpoint. I guess you fine with Call of Duty running unlimited without being fatigued and shoot while jumping in mid-air which is arcady. Make up your mind on what you want.
    the difference between the system we have now and a "Weight system" is that one is logical and the other is not.
    it is not logical for you to take more damage because you switch from one Hat to another hat. it is logical if you are slower because you are heavier. it is logical that you take less damage if you go from naked to juggernaut armor. it is not logical that people can see you better or worst because some magical number. it is logical that people may not spot you as easy you wear a gillie suit. do i need to go on?

    on cod..1. seems you didnt play the beta yet. 2. you dont have unlimited sprint. you have tactical sprint and than Sprint. also 3. COD is an Arcade shooter...just that its a joke that its more realistic than Ghost Recon as of today its not about how good cod got but how bad recon has fallen.
    Share this post

  2. #142
    I played the cod multiplayer beta this morning...just saying since we keep talking about it. I don't like it at all and I stand by what I said more than ever....as far as realism goes it's not even remotely close. Breakpoint is far far more realistic.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #143
    Bone_Frog's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,984
    Originally Posted by RaulO4 Go to original post
    well answer it again,
    for "Realism" you are ok not being able to hostel weapons..which you can do in real
    but its ok for weight not to be a thing which is not how life works.

    with a weight system in place..than the game tactical choice would be wider. your choice would have positives and negatives...which ubi do not like which is another story all together.
    So do you want me to answer how carrying two primaries could be realistic, which was your original question or how weight management works both in the real world and in the game?

    I get the feeling that you really don't care, that you are set on believing that COD:MW is more realistic somehow and that GRB is failing at being a MilSim(which it never claimed to be). It is a tactical shooter/military shooter. If you want more realistic go play ARMA3 or America's Army(the latter you can play for free).

    GR has never been about realism. Here is the description of the Stone Bell mission:
    Word just came down from HQ, gentlemen. We have official confirmation that at 0600 hours, 3 Russian armored divisions crossed the border and linked up with rebel forces to the north. The Russian foreign minister has issued a statement condemning "International meddling in regional affairs". Look's like we've got ourselves a full-scale international incident.

    For now, the US is still backing the legitimate Georgian government. Our orders are, quote, "to aid the Georgian Army's defensive operations in any way practical". Short and sweet means we've got the green light to blow stuff up.

    First priority is to slow down the main armored column headed for T'bilisi. We've identified an ambush point about 60 klicks west of here where the highway crosses under a rail line. A Georgian command post is nearby. If it's overrun, their entire western flank will collapse. Take out the Russian advance patrols first, then the tanks. And keep your demolitions expert under cover until you need him. Those tanks aren't going to be stopped by anything less than a rocket up the tailpipe.
    60,000 armored cav pour across the border, link up with an unspecified number of rebels and we are relying on six soldiers to hold the Western flank. LOLOLOLOL... Please tell me more about GR being realistic.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  4. #144
    "Quick question, how is Breakpoint less tactical than Wildlands?"

    I love how nothing about this thread has been a quick answer. Very interesting reading though
    Share this post

  5. #145
    RaulO4's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,458
    "So do you want me to answer how carrying two primaries could be realistic, which was your original question or how weight management works both in the real world and in the game?"

    this game doesnt have a Weight system. so how are you gonna explain how it works in Break Point?

    "
    I get the feeling that you really don't care, that you are set on believing that COD:MW is more realistic somehow and that GRB is failing at being a MilSim(which it never claimed to be). It is a tactical shooter/military shooter"

    Ghost Recon WAS a realistic shooter (not mil sim) WAS is the key word. It has become an Arcade shooter worst than COD with this looter shooter system. oh look this base ball cap is gonna some how make me take less damage and be seen less! << not even cod does this...yet.

    "
    GR has never been about realism"
    ...you sure played GR?



    Share this post