Card rotation? | Forums

[evanddavidson]

Hollywood is a terrific example of the negative Forum posters I was talking about in a different thread. People tried to help you and you attempted to prevent that help from happening just so that you could complain more. And apparently Evan is on the same train as Hollywood. Sabotaging the game and attacks on the dev team in my opinion should not only warrant a ban from the forums but also from the game we don't need this negativity.

The game sucks. The development team sucks. The only reason any plays this game, the only reason anyone is here is because they are a fan of South Park. No one is going "On wow, a RedLynx game, I must play that."

It is an absolute shame what RedLynx and Unisoft have done with this South Park IP.

[hollywoodwins]

I like how I clearly laid out the information that I needed and yet CURAL chose to write about something else and then when I stated that it was for the community managers CURAL said that I didn’t say that in my statement but yet that didn’t stop you from asking what units are used even though I said that I didn’t want to talk about that. So even if I had mentioned that it was for the community managers it’s not like it would’ve mattered or stopped you from commenting because I said that I didn’t need any questions about the units but you still question that, so act like anything I would’ve said would’ve changed your opinion or your decision to write a comment. You got “negativity” because again three people manage to answer the question without all of the extra information and yet CURAL needed to know all these extra things. It was a simple question about card rotation again the cards on the field did not matter I simply wanted to know when cards came back into rotation three other people manage to answer the question without asking what other units so you can say that I was being negative towards him but the truth is I just wanted an answer for the question that I asked. Not some extra BS. I have also made several post stating that it was not all bad and that I enjoy this game thoroughly so if you didn’t notice that on the forum page where it’s literally titled as that “it isn’t all bad” but yet you seem to think that I’m the only one saying negative things even though I’ve just made a forum post about the good things so whatever you say man good job Marioncobra I am so evil. Maybe if people just answer the question like they were supposed to and didn’t ask more questions it was a pretty simple question it didn’t need more questions to answer it. And again the root of the problem is that he didn’t want to believe that anything could possibly go wrong. He was positive there was someway that this worked correctly and wanted to find a way that it worked, instead of just believing what I said. Again, 3 other people answered without the information he requested and I didn’t say anything to them. Do you know why?? Because they actually answered the question and didn’t ask more irrelevant questions trying to figure out some magical way of what I said not happening. The truth is he simply didn’t believe what I wrote and wanted to be right. I stated clearly what happened several times and he is still certain that I have some incorrect information and it COULDNT POSSIBLY HAVE HAPPENED THE WAY I SAID BECAUSE THIS GAME DOESNT HAVE ANY MISTAKES. Right CURAL?? Just admit you didn’t believe me and you were trolling trying to defend the developers from some nonexistent “attack”

I don’t need to be attacked for defending my post asking a question. He chose to ask inflammatory questions after I stated they were not relevant and not to ask about them. You don’t want to honor my requests then I really see no need to be nice. I stated the information I wanted and he chose to ask irrelevant questions to try and discredit me. You can say I was being rude but I feel like this guy has been trolling me since the beginning otherwise he wouldn’t have done something I so clearly asked him not to and continually try to discredit my information. Stop playing the victim because I told you I didnt care about your opinion. Pc babies.

[Feco.-]

Man, how old are you?

[Cural42]

I like how I clearly laid out the information that I needed and yet CURAL chose to write about something else and then when I stated that it was for the community managers CURAL said that I didn’t say that in my statement but yet that didn’t stop you from asking what units are used even though I said that I didn’t want to talk about that. So even if I had mentioned that it was for the community managers it’s not like it would’ve mattered or stopped you from commenting because I said that I didn’t need any questions about the units but you still question that, so act like anything I would’ve said would’ve changed your opinion or your decision to write a comment. You got “negativity” because again three people manage to answer the question without all of the extra information and yet CURAL needed to know all these extra things. It was a simple question about card rotation again the cards on the field did not matter I simply wanted to know when cards came back into rotation three other people manage to answer the question without asking what other units so you can say that I was being negative towards him but the truth is I just wanted an answer for the question that I asked. Not some extra BS. I have also made several post stating that it was not all bad and that I enjoy this game thoroughly so if you didn’t notice that on the forum page where it’s literally titled as that “it isn’t all bad” but yet you seem to think that I’m the only one saying negative things even though I’ve just made a forum post about the good things so whatever you say man good job Marioncobra I am so evil. Maybe if people just answer the question like they were supposed to and didn’t ask more questions it was a pretty simple question it didn’t need more questions to answer it. And again the root of the problem is that he didn’t want to believe that anything could possibly go wrong. He was positive there was someway that this worked correctly and wanted to find a way that it worked, instead of just believing what I said. Again, 3 other people answered without the information he requested and I didn’t say anything to them. Do you know why?? Because they actually answered the question and didn’t ask more irrelevant questions trying to figure out some magical way of what I said not happening. The truth is he simply didn’t believe what I wrote and wanted to be right. I stated clearly what happened several times and he is still certain that I have some incorrect information and it COULDNT POSSIBLY HAVE HAPPENED THE WAY I SAID BECAUSE THIS GAME DOESNT HAVE ANY MISTAKES. Right CURAL?? Just admit you didn’t believe me and you were trolling trying to defend the developers from some nonexistent “attack”

I don’t need to be attacked for defending my post asking a question. He chose to ask inflammatory questions after I stated they were not relevant and not to ask about them. You don’t want to honor my requests then I really see no need to be nice. I stated the information I wanted and he chose to ask irrelevant questions to try and discredit me. You can say I was being rude but I feel like this guy has been trolling me since the beginning otherwise he wouldn’t have done something I so clearly asked him not to and continually try to discredit my information. Stop playing the victim because I told you I didnt care about your opinion. Pc babies.

Wow... Just, wow... What a piece of work. I mean, there is just too much tin foil in that hat for me to even wrap my head around where to even start!! You try to help someone, and their response is to attack you. With a winning personality like that, I'm sure you must be the life of the party!! At least, you will be, once you're old enough to be allowed to go out to parties on your own without a chaperone.

So, first of all, I had asked _one_ single question in my response, so not sure where "all these extra things" or "inflammatory questions" comes from. Also, whoever's answer it was that you accepted as the "correct" one had provided you with their response AFTER you had already replied to my question, and possibly to other peoples' questions. How do you know they wouldn't also have asked a question first had you not already given the answer?

As to your troll comments, that ALMOST makes me want to make you the first person I've ever trolled online! But I'm not going to let even you lead me to stooping to that level. If you want a troll, talk to that guy with the Sudan post, I'm sure he'll accommodate.

My day job is tech support. I spend every day troubleshooting computer problems. If I am presented with a technical problem, I troubleshoot. Part of the troubleshooting process is... now get ready for this... ASKING QUESTIONS!! This was one of the very first things we were taught to do when troubleshooting. The first step! Technically, it was listed as "Gather Information" in such training, but it means the same thing. Also, in troubleshooting, you eliminate possibilities based on facts. Why immediately assume a glitch or a cheat when you have not exhausted the possibilities that exist within the rules? Yes, the game can be buggy sometimes, and yes, people cheat. Those are both possibilities. But we can't know that your specific situation involves one of those until we've ruled out the other possibilities. However, based on your other reply to me, it definitely looks like a possible cheater, since he was running a 3 theme deck! Mind Control, Pope Timmy, AND SOMM all in the same deck? That's a new one to me!

So excuse me for actually taking some time out of my day to help some poor kid with understanding why something that happened in his match might have happened. And yet, somehow I'm the one categorized as playing the victim? Tell me what part of either of my two replies indicate that I am playing the victim? The only thing I am a victim of here is having my time wasted by actually trying to be helpful, because obviously you've already decided to arbitrarily ignore my response because it was too well thought out, logical, and reasonable.

And for the record, in a 12-card deck, if there are 3 on the field and 5 in your hand, that's only 4 left in the draw deck, one of which is the card that was just killed. Since RNG determines which card is drawn next, that's a 25% chance SOMM could be next after burning a 2-cost spell. And that is WITH believing everything you said, which I totally did right up until the point you said this guy had cards from 3 different themes in his deck!

[hollywoodwins]

It has literally just happened again this time with rogue token. 20 min ago. Uses rogue token to kill my aliens on my side of the middle. I kill token. I mind control his awesome o (his only unit) just on the other side of the middle line and he uses token again. I’m positive these people are cheating. Again another example of when the card was played immediately after and ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHY THE CARDS DONT MATTER. The card was literally played again almost the moment it died. Everything else is irrelevant. I’m telling you there is a problem and it needs to be looked into.

Again I don’t need any speculation as to what happened. It’s clearly a hack. The card was played immediately after it died

[hollywoodwins]

Wow... Just, wow... What a piece of work. I mean, there is just too much tin foil in that hat for me to even wrap my head around where to even start!! You try to help someone, and their response is to attack you. With a winning personality like that, I'm sure you must be the life of the party!! At least, you will be, once you're old enough to be allowed to go out to parties on your own without a chaperone.

So, first of all, I had asked _one_ single question in my response, so not sure where "all these extra things" or "inflammatory questions" comes from. Also, whoever's answer it was that you accepted as the "correct" one had provided you with their response AFTER you had already replied to my question, and possibly to other peoples' questions. How do you know they wouldn't also have asked a question first had you not already given the answer?

As to your troll comments, that ALMOST makes me want to make you the first person I've ever trolled online! But I'm not going to let even you lead me to stooping to that level. If you want a troll, talk to that guy with the Sudan post, I'm sure he'll accommodate.

My day job is tech support. I spend every day troubleshooting computer problems. If I am presented with a technical problem, I troubleshoot. Part of the troubleshooting process is... now get ready for this... ASKING QUESTIONS!!

NOBODY ASKED YOU TO TROUBLESHOOT. IT DOESNT SAY TROUBLESHOOT.

IT SAYS EXPLAIN CARD ROTATION. THESE ARE DIFFERENT. YOU CLEARLY NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE WORD “EXPLAIN”

EXPLAIN DOES NOT EQUAL ASK MORE QUESTIONS. EXPLAIN MEANS SAY WHAT YOU KNOW, NOT ASK ANOTHER QUESTION.

MAYBE YOU JUST DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION WAS NOT “ LET ME EXPLAIN MY MATCH AND YOU TROUBLESHOOT IT”

IT WAS SIMPLY EXPLAIN WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT CARD ROTATION. REALLY SIMPLE.

YOUR GETTING RESPONSES BECAUSE YOU SAID I WAS NEGATIVE. I WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU SAYING THE SAME THING. IM TELLING YOU THAT YOU DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION AND YOU DONT KNOW WHY.

As for 3 themes that was meant for an edit I was talking to someone about that while I was writing that and typed it into the response so that WAS MY MISTAKE that I meant to fix.

The only negativity is me telling you to interpret the question better and don’t question a question with a question. Especially when it’s not relevant.

I don’t wish anyone ill will. I just want you to understand the question before you start talking

[hollywoodwins]

that's only 4 left in the draw deck, one of which is the card that was just killed. Since RNG determines which card is drawn next, that's a 25% chance SOMM could be next

Well except for if it just died it has a 0% chance so I don’t understand why you think it has higher odds for some reason because it shouldn’t if it goes to the bottom of the deck like it SHOULD.

[Cural42]

NOBODY ASKED YOU TO TROUBLESHOOT. IT DOESNT SAY TROUBLESHOOT.

IT SAYS EXPLAIN CARD ROTATION. THESE ARE DIFFERENT. YOU CLEARLY NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS BECAUSE YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE WORD “EXPLAIN”

EXPLAIN DOES NOT EQUAL ASK MORE QUESTIONS. EXPLAIN MEANS SAY WHAT YOU KNOW, NOT ASK ANOTHER QUESTION.

MAYBE YOU JUST DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION WAS NOT “ LET ME EXPLAIN MY MATCH AND YOU TROUBLESHOOT IT”

IT WAS SIMPLY EXPLAIN WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT CARD ROTATION. REALLY SIMPLE.

YOUR GETTING RESPONSES BECAUSE YOU SAID I WAS NEGATIVE. I WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU SAYING THE SAME THING. IM TELLING YOU THAT YOU DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION AND YOU DONT KNOW WHY.

Guess I must've struck a nerve. Must be pretty difficult to go through life with a hair trigger. Like I said, try to help, and get attacked instead. You're like the scorpion on the turtle's back.

Go ahead and record this in the win column of your little scorecard, if it makes you feel better. I don't bother to keep one, so it makes no matter to me. You can be someone else's headache instead; I'm done.

Edit: Re: "YOUR GETTING RESPONSES BECAUSE YOU SAID I WAS NEGATIVE."

I think you might be conflating someone else's post with mine, as I never made any such statement. Just saying.

[Hanmann]

And for the record, in a 12-card deck, if there are 3 on the field and 5 in your hand, that's only 4 left in the draw deck, one of which is the card that was just killed. Since RNG determines which card is drawn next, that's a 25% chance SOMM could be next after burning a 2-cost spell.

I'm not getting into the rest of the rest of the discussion that is going on here, but this information you are giving is incorrect. Originally the game worked like this, drawing cards at random from the stack, but this was changed several months ago. RL explained this in an official post, but I'm not going to start looking for it. Cards are now drawn from the top of the stack. It was changed because players were complaining about losing matches due to unlucky RNG.

[hollywoodwins]

It happened again this time it was cyborg Kenny three times in the last 45 seconds of the match not to mention the two times he had already played the card before that on my side of the field.