Yes, that is correct and in general i would say it is a good thing that it is a new game and not a sequel to Wildlands, but This is a rip off of Division for the most part and a touch of Far Cry, which causes us to be so disaapointed because it is still called Ghost Recon and not Division FarCry.
Ergo, since copying was done anyhow it would have been much wiser to implement more Wildlands than Division etc.
Spot on! I'd say Division and Far Cry New Dawn to be exact.Originally Posted by SapperDaddy39 Go to original post
The insanely boring grind and awful tiered weapon/gear/enemy system combined.
I not to big on FarCry but The Division copied GR too. Especially from GRFS. So they do have the right to copy some elements from each other but they are unique on they own.Originally Posted by KE_Maverick Go to original post
Exactly this.Originally Posted by chhowa74 Go to original post
I owned a few UBi titles all the Far Cry's but the reskins, I value my time, and what I choose to play with it: Some titles I lost interest in. Can you tell which title kept my interest?
FC3 - 405 Hrs
FC4 - 132 Hrs
FC5 - 82 Hrs
AC2 - 7 Hrs
GRW - 769 Hours
At this point and to be positive, I have played BP more than I have AC2
Regards,
I am all up for the type of system they have but only in an RPG game, like assassins creed for example where the whole level system for items and your character actually makes sense, not sure if it was lost on you but this isn't an RPG and frankly, the game wouldn't fit an RPG type mechanic and indeed, it doesn't.
With that being said, I don't understand why they just couldn't reskin Wildlands, that way you don't have to change every last little thing which does mean saving money. Your argument is so flawed because you are saying that they have done for just cause with evidently no regard for what worked in Wildlands, or the ability to reskin Wildlands like I said.