🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #11
    Yes, that is correct and in general i would say it is a good thing that it is a new game and not a sequel to Wildlands, but This is a rip off of Division for the most part and a touch of Far Cry, which causes us to be so disaapointed because it is still called Ghost Recon and not Division FarCry.

    Ergo, since copying was done anyhow it would have been much wiser to implement more Wildlands than Division etc.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Originally Posted by SapperDaddy39 Go to original post
    You are right, this is a mix of Division and Far cry. and that is why some of us who liked the Ghost recon concept are a little sad and mildly disappointed.

    I am seriously trying to find things I like about this loot crate, guns with different colors and flower picking stuff....but it is hard.
    Spot on! I'd say Division and Far Cry New Dawn to be exact.
    The insanely boring grind and awful tiered weapon/gear/enemy system combined.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #13
    xxFratosxx's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,582
    Originally Posted by KE_Maverick Go to original post
    Yes, that is correct and in general i would say it is a good thing that it is a new game and not a sequel to Wildlands, but This is a rip off of Division for the most part and a touch of Far Cry, which causes us to be so disaapointed because it is still called Ghost Recon and not Division FarCry.

    Ergo, since copying was done anyhow it would have been much wiser to implement more Wildlands than Division etc.
    I not to big on FarCry but The Division copied GR too. Especially from GRFS. So they do have the right to copy some elements from each other but they are unique on they own.
    Share this post

  4. #14
    Cancelled preorde due to having to alwaysbe online
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  5. #15
    You're right.

    This isn't Wildlands.

    But this IS Ghost Recon.

    Yet it strangely feels nothing like any GR title I have ever played.

    Not entirely bad... I love me a good open world shooter. Just NOT Ghost Recon.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #16
    Originally Posted by chhowa74 Go to original post
    This isn't Wildlands.

    But this IS Ghost Recon.
    Exactly this.
    Share this post

  7. #17
    They just need to fix the over excited movement. It's less deliberate. They need to have a slower walk available. Because what they currently have is like a fast walk. Wildlands hit the movement pretty well in that aspect. Calm the movement down, just a bit please, this is not MGSV.
    Share this post

  8. #18
    I owned a few UBi titles all the Far Cry's but the reskins, I value my time, and what I choose to play with it: Some titles I lost interest in. Can you tell which title kept my interest?

    FC3 - 405 Hrs
    FC4 - 132 Hrs
    FC5 - 82 Hrs
    AC2 - 7 Hrs
    GRW - 769 Hours

    At this point and to be positive, I have played BP more than I have AC2

    Regards,
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  9. #19
    I am all up for the type of system they have but only in an RPG game, like assassins creed for example where the whole level system for items and your character actually makes sense, not sure if it was lost on you but this isn't an RPG and frankly, the game wouldn't fit an RPG type mechanic and indeed, it doesn't.

    With that being said, I don't understand why they just couldn't reskin Wildlands, that way you don't have to change every last little thing which does mean saving money. Your argument is so flawed because you are saying that they have done for just cause with evidently no regard for what worked in Wildlands, or the ability to reskin Wildlands like I said.
    Share this post