Unofficial community poll: | Forums

[Glass_Ghost]

you just ask for experience rating. DId you reade No 1??? THink what NPS means. Would you recommend GR to a friend? Thats the NPS question. But there is no answer since there is no product out yet..........
Q2 is CS experience rating nothing to do with NPS

With respect, If you think NPS exists exclusive of CX than I dont think I can have a discussion with you with logical reasoning.

A 1-10 rating is the easiast way to attain a Net Promoter Score and guage the community response to the Bereakpoint brand after experiancing the beta. There is no need for me to drill it down with aditional qualfyers as that could potentially detract from any post beta survay that Ubisoft chooses to conduct, likewise I am not here to influence opinion. This poll was purly to qualify the community reaction to the beta whilst the forums are in chaos.

[SniperBaitD27M]

Bump.

[A.-.Jent]

Nice one!

[X_____ACE_____X]

will this have any dramatic influence on the final product? 78.9% should be a big enough percentage to warrant a response from the devs? Well if they can't be bothered to respond I can't be bothered to purchase any of their games. It won't happen but in an ideal world the other 78% would do the same.

[dragonc1aw]

I am not fond of the new system, but still enjoyed my experience. I think the looter system was such a curve ball out of left field that I am shocked about it more than anything.

Reading some of the reviews that the gear level only makes the enemies more lethal to the player (sighting time, accuracy, damage), but this system is probably also in preparation for the raid. But why? Give us the more difficult areas like in Wildlands and let the player choose if they are prepared for the number of enemies.

[Bangtail]

Firstly, I don't think this franchise needs Raids or PvP, but that's my opinion, and I know others feel differently.

If you are going to insist on having them, limit the tiered weapons, peacock/RMT hub, bullet sponge enemies et al to Raids and PvP, keep it out of the PvE portion of the game.

Problem solved.

[OldCappy]

Sorry, I can't get into the poll. If I could, and looking at it from a GR perspective, I'd probably say no/5.

Now, as a standalone game, maybe a new franchise, I'd say it's a fairly big game. I didn't think the overall game play was too bad. I'm sure it's a "monies worth game". I think it could be fun to play, but seeing as I was/am using Wildlands as my escape from the Division 2 and Destiny 2 loot/shooter model, this game doesn't do that for me. Just my opinion.

Many people have listed in detail what they disliked about the game so I don't really want to do that again since I'm in general agreement with things like the social hub, tiered loot, movement awkwardness, etc. Plus some little things like I rescue some civilians who had arms tied behind their back and all they have to say to me is "I'm making them nervous", and some other cringe worthy dialog. Or a drone that can spot me on the ground under the tree canopy unless I roll in the mud but somehow fails to pick up what must be a massive heat bloom from a large "village in a cave" full of people, homes, vendors and a few fires. And a few other things like that.

At some point down the road, maybe after the AI squad is available and the bugs are cleared up I might buy it. In summary this game is in my "buy on sale" bucket. Not really as a GR game, but as a fairly large, reasonably fun, time killer.

[Modda.]

So you want it to be like wildands after you do the campaign and side mission everyone just does supply missions over and over again wildands is boring and then complain about no endgame. Raids and killing behemoths and looking for better gear is a good endgame for now.

[sleeperreaper]

GRB is a fun game with cool new tech and features. The engine is beautiful. The Island is massive and impressive. The talent trees are extensive. The perks are fun and creative. It all comes together to form a fun modern (albeit formulaic) loot shooter.

The problem isn't that GRB is a bad game, the problem is its NOT Ghost Recon and that's probably why so many new players (folks who joined the franchise with Wildlands) are so confused by the explosion of anger from veteran players.

For GH fans this is an enormous betrayal because we have no games left at the hands of Ubisoft. Rainbow Six got turned into an action shooter then a whatever Siege is. Splinter Cell was turned into a basic cable action game. And now Ghost Recon...

[Aeecto]

Now close to 400 votes and ~80% dislike the new direction of breakpoint.

The community has spoken since this is a community poll.
Seems Ubisoft listened to the wrong people (content creators like streamer and youtuber) because everyone who got into the first test liked it, especially the old beginning of the game, the survival system, no unlimited bandages, no healthregen, class specific weapons, etc.... except the gearscore.
All these peoole gave the same feedback and only content creators didn't like it and ask for easier gameplay, all weapons, healthregen.
Guess what we got.... Nothing the community asked for.

Remember Firefall, Lawbreaker or any other game where devs only listened to youtuber? All had to shut down because no one played it in the end after the youtubers left quick and the real community stopped playing because devs didnt listen to them.