Originally Posted by
TOCKSYK
Go to original post
Wrong. I have been bashing on characters that are overtuned a.k.a Hitokiri and Raider. I have never had feud with any player. But I guess I'm 'bashing' when I just want a more balanced game without characters that can infinitely hold you in defense mode like Hitokiri or characters that take half your health on a heavy like Raider.
I mean with all due respect the last couple of threads you have written make no mention of you wanting a more balanced game. One was about people ganking in brawls being "pu**ies" (your own words). Another one was a rant about team game modes and people being carried by the characters they play and then being toxic, which is fine but you then went out of your way to make the statement that 1v1 is where "the real skills show", which can be interpreted as a dig towards players that are simply playing a 4v4 mode as it is intended. As well as saying, "We need good players not Raiders and Hitokiris." Which is a dig directly aimed at a player that chooses to play those characters instead of just sticking to criticising the character itself.
Your Raider thread was a criticism of the character but yet again you finished it with a statement of "We don't want noob friendly heroes". Which is a strong suggestion that you regard players of this character as "noobs". In all 3 threads you had to be encouraged by posters replying to your thread to examine a more objective viewpoint and actually start discussing balance because your opening statements were mostly just angry venting.
And I don't need to mention that in this current thread's opening statement you don't mention anything about wanting a "more balanced game". You only started talking about balance when challenged by my reply. So you'll excuse me for making the obvious observation that your threads haven't been starting from a place of constructive criticism or discussions about balance. They've been starting from a place of venting and ranting and only ever go to a somewhat more constructive discussion depending on the people that respond and who choose to be constructive despite your opening statement not being very constructive.
Originally Posted by
TOCKSYK
Go to original post
This thread was a rewrite, not a copy paste. And yes, I find it funny because it's the truth, as I said. Don't get why everyone is defending those heroes
Yeah they're cool, but do you need an easy-noob friendly hero? Now I know you're gonna say ''but I don't defend the hero, your thread is just not a constructive thread''. It's not, you're right. It's just pointing at the huge mistake Ubisoft made. Maybe not the mix up. Keep the mix up, but the HA has to be delayed and the mix up should end the chain
Of course we gotta wait another 2-3 months though.
Nobody is disputing the fact that Hito needs to be looked at so I don't see where you're getting the notion that "everyone is defending those heroes." I haven't seen a single sane person actually defending the speed at which Hitokiri's hyper armour comes out from neutral. As for the mixup, there's plenty of people who have discussed and debated the order of the mixup, i.e. the sweep should be the one that guarantees the heavy and the kick should be the one guaranteeing the light.
There's plenty of ways to make a constructive thread about balancing heroes. Your current approach just isn't it.
1 people found this helpful