🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #31
    Originally Posted by IAmOddGirl Go to original post
    The problem here is this is YOUR OPINION. Not a fact..an OPINION. Know the difference. I do not find these kinds of matches boring or frustrating. DO I like getting chained by 3 shugoki's? NO, should they be allowed to play how they want? YES. I'll write the same comment I put in another thread about this right here.
    Give me your credit card number so I can take out every cent I spent on this game including my Preorder and Season Pass, Along with Steel packs. Then you can make changes to the game I bought and am happy with. Until then it is a solid NO. I have literally played every single day since launch even back when the servers were an absolute disaster and have not once hated this game for any reason. I still have alot of fun. Every match is still a fresh and exciting experience for me and if I have to say I hate something..I hate the players who want the game changed to a degree that would make it a whole new game. I didn't buy that game..I bought the one I'm currently playing.

    Also did you just compare the difficulty of something that requires training, genetic prowess, and physical endurance to something you sit on your two buttcheeks and do with your thumbs and mental capacity?
    Now i know why this guy got banned
    Share this post

  2. #32
    Originally Posted by IRostiI Go to original post
    The thing that have multiple of the same hero on one team can be exploited easly it's not an opinion, it's a fact, considering the nature of the game.
    You don't like to be chained by 3 shugoki's or wathelse? Oh, what a surprise, who know why.

    The money you spent on this game it's not an argument.
    I have the game since day one and still play it, that doesn't mean that the game don't have to improve.

    The game i bought didn't have this perk system (that is better than the old one), so?
    The game i bought didn't have all this light attack spam meta.
    The game i bought didn't have all this unblockable and bash spam.
    Etc.

    You hate the players who want the game changed but the game changed a lot since day one, changed so much that the single pick in 4v4 it's nothing compared to the other changes, so no, you are not playing the one you bought.

    p.s. if you spend money for steel pack, it's your problem. As i said, it's just money grab.

    p.p.s. all it's genetic, even when you play a videogame, everyone have their own limit.
    Little example, you think all can reach Shroud level on fps just playing fps? No.
    Obviously you can improve, but there is always a different limit for everyone. Yes, even in for honor. If someone can do a thing at a certain level doesn't mean that everyone can do the same at the same level, and this in any field.
    Agree and i feel like i've reach my reaction limit with orochi's lights, and anything faster than that gonna be unreactable for me
    Share this post

  3. #33
    Originally Posted by IAmOddGirl Go to original post
    The problem here is this is YOUR OPINION. Not a fact..an OPINION. Know the difference. I do not find these kinds of matches boring or frustrating. DO I like getting chained by 3 shugoki's? NO, should they be allowed to play how they want? YES. I'll write the same comment I put in another thread about this right here.
    Give me your credit card number so I can take out every cent I spent on this game including my Preorder and Season Pass, Along with Steel packs. Then you can make changes to the game I bought and am happy with. Until then it is a solid NO. I have literally played every single day since launch even back when the servers were an absolute disaster and have not once hated this game for any reason. I still have alot of fun. Every match is still a fresh and exciting experience for me and if I have to say I hate something..I hate the players who want the game changed to a degree that would make it a whole new game. I didn't buy that game..I bought the one I'm currently playing.

    Also did you just compare the difficulty of something that requires training, genetic prowess, and physical endurance to something you sit on your two buttcheeks and do with your thumbs and mental capacity?
    Get off your high horse. If the devs are incorporating spectator mode and pusing for competitive...guess what that could mean? SINGLE PICK hero per team. Maybe for new kinds of game modes or modifies exixsting ones, but it could happen or at least be tested..."coughtestinggroundscough". If that were to happen and prove to be superior and made an official change...guess who is definitely not getting their money back....
    Share this post

  4. #34
    Vakris_One's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    3,449
    Imagine replying to posts that are 5 months old.
    Share this post

  5. #35
    Originally Posted by Vakris_One Go to original post
    Imagine replying to posts that are 5 months old.
    That's just how it goes on a forum. Until closed or deleted, no conversation is truly over.
    Share this post

  6. #36
    Originally Posted by AmonDarkGod Go to original post
    Techinally speaking 400ms lights arent meant to be reactionary to begin with lol
    i can't react to his second top light followup but other than that is reactable for me
    Share this post

  7. #37
    As some can tell, I'm a middle ground kind of guy, so I suggest implementing a single pick playlist the same way Event and Testing Ground playlists are implemented in the multiplayer. However, this may divide the player base, especially on PC, and may lead to low activity on some game modes but at least no one's needs would be compromised for the most part.

    My take on single pick, however, is that it won't eliminate the issue of frustrating ganks since there are many devastating single pick based combinations that can be chosen from Raider, LB, Jormungandr, Centurion, Hitokiri, Shugoki, Gladiator, Valkyrie, Shaman, Highlander, PK, Shinobi, and Shaolin, to say the least. In other words, there are plenty of heroes that can either immobilise you or floor you to initiate ganks.
    Share this post

  8. #38
    Originally Posted by Vakris_One Go to original post
    Imagine replying to posts that are 5 months old.
    I just realised that. Shame on me!
    Share this post

  9. #39
    I can easily imagine why someone would reply to a 5 month post.Someone who doesn't feel the need to start a new one when one already exists. A lot of these threads are just carbon copies of threads written over two years ago, with the same people giving the same tired responses. Most people start new threads for attention. Not always attention for themselves ( calm down ),but mosty for attention to the problem. Bombardment and persistance IS a very effective technique,but not always and certainly not when overused. I think using old threads at the moment is a very good idea. It's a perfect way to demonstrate just how long a problem has existed and still bothers people. I believe it would cut down on repetition and encourage new ideas. And that's just off the top of my head Vakris.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  10. #40
    I'm not a huge PVP gamer,but aren't most of the top successful pvp games single pick. I could be wrong, but that was my impression. Not saying you always have to follow the leader, but it didn't seem to 'doom' other pvp games.
    Share this post