The faction war is completely flawed | Forums

[Grivois_Gaulois]

Knights faction have a territory with 32+ millions troops for no reason and not enough troops on the east front. Looks like the automatic troops deployement is kind of broken for knights, explains a lot considering the great vikings results...

[OhHowSheGoingEh]

Knights faction have a territory with 32+ millions troops for no reason and not enough troops on the east front. Looks like the automatic troops deployement is kind of broken for knights, explains a lot considering the great vikings results...

Its been flawed right from the start. If you chose to join the viking faction you should only contribute to rhe cause when playing a viking. Or at the very least only give half the troops if playing a different faction.

[p0wn3rki11]

ANY game with a faction war is inherently flawed. Not even anything to do with the autoplacement system here, it is literally just how faction wars are. Vikings won season 1 and it would be safe to say at least 1/4 of each faction jumped ship to the winner. It happens in every game, one faction wins a bit more than the others and after that wins everything due to sheer numbers of either players who quit to join the winners or new players looking up and finding vikings are the best to join because they have the most players. Knights have had virtually noone from the start, but the most adamant players, Samurai had a lot but now quite a lot of em are idle or not playing really anymore, and Vikings have probably half the playerbase. The silver lining to it all is nothing from the faction war winnings has been good since season 3.

[fadingtrails]

I'm not sure why they don't add incentives for joining smaller factions.

I've been sticking it out with the Samurai, but it's been pointless.