Do you guys do this on purpose? | Forums

[Disneyadventure]

So you set the limit on extended mags, test it yourselves, run beta's on it, decide it's great and release the game with it then decide that "Oh My God", they can shoot too many bullets at once?

Do you guys do this on purpose just to piss off your community?

I mean if it's too much then don't release the game with it in the first place, why let us make builds around something you know you are going to nerf?

And how could you not know it unless you aren't testing your stuff before you release it.

Is that the case?

I think whomever you put in charge of this should come on the forums and answer these questions or did you fire him already for being an idiot?

[chagadiel]

Oh my word. It was great the 60 round mag but it came with 10 percent reduction in rpm which is pretty hefty. so they ditched the rpm loss and something had to go. its not the end of the world.

I would love to still have a 60 mag but you know what I have redone my Ar and its fine 41 rounds and with a faster reload gear set with no losses to stability and accuracy still seems pretty sweet.

[xIGHO5TIx]

Omg, I just seen this too. Wtf are these devs doing?I think I'm just gonna stop playing this bs just like TD1 and come back a year later.

[BioXTC]

Honestly I'm not surprised. +30 was excessive. I say this as a someone who mains ARs. However the nerf was also excessive. +15 or so would have been a better change.

[Hoyman77]

Yea. When I saw it was 10, I was very disappointed. 60 round (with the extended mag) AR was what The Division 1 had.

[chagadiel]

yes agreed 15 would be just right

[xIGHO5TIx]

I'm starting to wonder what or who's feedback do these devs actually listen to

[Disneyadventure]

60 was not excessive when you have their bullet sponges rushing you.

It jelled perfectly.

It wasn't overpowered like their pew pew shooter was, it was a good match for the content.

Plus to get that mag you had to take the negative hit so it balanced out.

What they ended up with is something worse than before.

[k.-.g.-.b]

+15 at the minimum and probably +20 WTF is with the 10? you guys looking to piss everyone off and get forums spammed with negativity?

[Hoyman77]

I'm starting to wonder what or who's feedback do these devs actually listen to

That is what I would like to know. When I heard them say it was "requested", I wondered who those idiots were who requested that? It was good, and made sense the way it was.