First of all, there are conversion kits for both MK16 and MK17.Originally Posted by Ghost416 Go to original post
Second, Mk16 is not Mk17 converted to 5.56, but it's a Mk16, which is Scar-L chambered in 5.56. But yes, IF you have a conversion kit, you can transform Mk16 from 5.56 to 7.62 rifle.
All of this - conversion program - happened after naming rifles Mk16 and Mk17, and was a simple measure to make those rifles universal. It's cheaper to convert one to other caliber than buying another gun.
So, no, it's BS, 'cause we are not talking about conversions, but about rifle that is called Mk16![]()
And damage to ballistic gel is not the same as damage to real humans: the goal is not to replicate people but get an objective, testable and consistent material to test damage/penetration. Like ballistic gel, the vehicle test I perform is to get data on damage in controlled settings. Darkdally damage tests are nonsensical and shouldn't really be paid any attention in my mind. He hits legs, some arms some heads, different distances, I mean they just aren't really scientific by any means and he admits so.Originally Posted by msssaf Go to original post
From what I could tell, mk17 generally took 1 bullet less to drop enemies than the mk18 or mk16. I also tested this on the heavy rebels and it seemed to confirm this.Originally Posted by Klaymond Go to original post
From what I’ve read, the most reliable way to test weapon damage on soft targets is against a Rebel Diversion put on alert by flash banging them. You get a mix of regular and heavies which match their Cartel counterparts. And when using full auto TTK is more important than number of bullets. The RoF of the 416 and TAR-21 make them the most effective ARs in the game.
Good data here...
https://www.reddit.com/r/GhostRecon/...mage_sheet_20/
The point I intended to make was maybe that was what the description was referring to, but I didn't actually say that in my post for some reason. I apologize for that. The Mk 16 in the game was modeled after an actual SCAR-L, there's no doubt about that.Originally Posted by Snumsmumrik_07 Go to original post
I'm not sure about converting a SCAR-L to fire 7.62 NATO, though. The dimensions where the upper and lower receivers connect are different and the ejection port might be a bit too small, but I digress.
I thought it was established long ago that shot detection range by enemies is a function of weapon class and not specific weapons within a class. In other words, all ARs are detected at the same range.Originally Posted by Ghost416 Go to original post
It would be very interesting if the MK18 was actually different. Do you mind doing your sleeping guard shot test with both rifles?
I can now attest to this. Same sound capture and (I think)ballistics as the mk17.Originally Posted by bandido0731 Go to original post
I'm actually digging it.
I've used both in similar situations. The detection range for the Mk 18 seems smaller to me.Originally Posted by VirtualRain. Go to original post