🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The Division forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #21
    I understand why others would want 16 players for more pvp action but if you’re like me and like BOTH pve/vp 16 players will make farming horrible and uneventful.

    times during the beta with 12 players the group I was in was literally running in circles behind other groups that already cleared LM. It was weird bc we cleared one in like hour.... just got really boring.

    I’d like to see two instead of three dzs and/or more LMs and eventually Ubisoft adds more dz areas
    Share this post

  2. #22
    64 players would be awesome! Total chaos warzone!
    Share this post

  3. #23
    The size of the DZs should be governed by the effectiveness of the servers. If they have been upgraded and the net code rewritten and tested so it works without much issue talk of adding more players is frankly just asking for trouble.

    Smaller maps with less players is to mitigate the poor servers.
    Share this post

  4. #24
    Ubi-RealDude's Avatar Community Manager
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    4,946
    Originally Posted by ckZ_TheBadFrag Go to original post
    64 players would be awesome! Total chaos warzone!
    That's definitely a hot take. How might so many players in one small space change the game for everyone involved?
    Share this post

  5. #25
    Goo-Goo-Man's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    DZ
    Posts
    4,534
    Originally Posted by Ubi-RealDude Go to original post
    How might so many players in one small space change the game for everyone involved?
    Everyone will be Sierra-Oscar-Lima as your servers would have suffered a Delta-India-Echo-Delta error
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by Ubi-RealDude Go to original post
    That's definitely a hot take. How might so many players in one small space change the game for everyone involved?
    It wouldn't work.
    The dz needs to be bigger before any more players are added. To allow maneuverability and tactical choices.
    Though as is I do feel the dz I got to play was to small in map size and players.
    Share this post

  7. #27
    For PvE the dark zone gets boring for me when all the landmarks and crates have been raided and I sit in the checkpoint until they refresh. Walking around solo just exploring is an open invite to get killed by a group so I wait until I have a reason to enter the dz.
    Share this post

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by Ubi-RealDude Go to original post
    That's definitely a hot take. How might so many players in one small space change the game for everyone involved?
    It would be the ultimate DZ for me. I like the total chaos when basicly they whole map is just filled with explosions and bullets. Maybe you could add the option for a 12 player or 64 player switch. Everyone who like the battlefield like massive chaos can join the 64 player and all the other players get the normal mode.
    I don't know how to describe it... it's just a lot of fun playing against a lot of other players at the same time. The typical 1v1 in the current DZ is just lame.
    Share this post

  9. #29
    Merphee's Avatar Volunteer Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Discord: Merphee#2325
    Posts
    3,821
    Originally Posted by ckZ_TheBadFrag Go to original post
    64 players would be awesome! Total chaos warzone!
    Yeah... total chaos right down to connection issues.
    Share this post

  10. #30
    I think in the prior betas the DZ did not have 12 people in it many times due to lower population.

    Since the DZ east is tbe biggest DZ i think 12 is fine. I could easily find pvp if i wanted and i could hide and do rogue things if i wanted.

    I think after release with more population the DZ will be fine at 12.
    Share this post