1. #1

    Suggestion

    At level 14, playing against these garbage level 18-20+ people, that can't hack it in the legendary leagues. I believe that when I win, I should receive extra rewards for crushing someone with multiple levels on me. I've seen level 15s that sit at rank 20. How's that even fun? Lol
    Share this post

  2. #2
    Welcome to legendary, where honest players are punished and cheaters, derankers and one card cheesers get rewarded. Get used to being ignored by the developers and if you have any good ideas, might as well keep them to yourself because any feedback gets ignored as well.
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Haha! Noted. Guess I grew up in a different era. I just don't see the appeal of beating someone 6 levels lower than you. Another suggestion could be, if you beat someone 4 or more levels lower than you, you shouldn't get phones or lockers.
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Feco.-'s Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    352
    It could hit back as well. I've seen several times even 13 lvl NKs with only level 4 epics, level 3 Legendaries. I'm level 19, 20 in days, with one level 3 Legendary...and I don't use that.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    For example there's a dude, level 19 sits at rank 35. The person should get zero event rewards And zero lockers. His highest challenge is what? A level 12? Lol. They need to take away the appeal. I highly doubt this is a person spending money on the game anyways.
    Share this post

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by fecog Go to original post
    It could hit back as well. I've seen several times even 13 lvl NKs with only level 4 epics, level 3 Legendaries. I'm level 19, 20 in days, with one level 3 Legendary...and I don't use that.
    This is now far too common over the past 2/3 months.
    Personal rank now means absolutely nothing as does the PVP ranking system because it is a joke.

    The only way I can a fix is;
    Change bonuses/packs for different tiers of legendary and lower
    Plus
    Limit the Level of a card too.
    Theres nothing wrong in upgrading a card to its highest power but you need to be within a bracket of legendary to utilise it.
    You have to be of a certain rank to earn particular packs so why can't the same be applied to card levels in legendary?

    If a player (regardless of personal rank) deranks and deliberatly drops into a lower area then those level 3 legendary cards are capped at level 1/2 and Epics/rares etc... get the same treatment. In the same way friendly levels work but on a tiered system.

    Prize brackets are already in play and they've now made it clear they want to alter card performance per game with the introduction of group related upgrades.
    There is no reason a card can't be lowered through PVP rank if it can be raised by association.

    This whole process already exists in the team wars model with different level caps.

    eg; NK with lvl 3+ Legendary, 5+ epics, 6+ rares and 7 commons has a PVP rank of 1500 - no problem you carry on playing with what you earned.
    Yet come Wednesday the same NK starts to drop rank for the event on Friday. Drops from PVP 2000 to 18000. When they play their Legendary should be capped at level 1 and epic at 4 etc... and you have to actual play your way back up the ranks.
    ... if you don't like the idea then you are part of the problem because it will force you to play cards and NK on a (sort of) level playing field but more so it will stop high levels cards getting an easy ride at the bottom and make them think twice. Whats the point in paying loads on packs/upgrades if you can't use them.
    Share this post

  7. #7
    I started playing when the game first came out. Since team wars started i made another account that i made just so my team has an extra body to earn bottlecaps and donations etc. I agree things have definitely gotten worse since i was climbing the ranks with my main account 7 or so months ago. I mean there were derankers then but holy crap its bad now. Ive played for a while now so i have enough experience to where it didn't affect me too much butni could totallyvsee how someone new picking up the game wouldn want to just quit immediately and not even bother with it after seeing what i saw happening. Just getting the alt account to level 10 was excruciating and not enjoyable at all. I got into legendary on my main acct at level 14 and managed fairly well. The way it is now, i dont see bringing the alt account into legendary until hes at least 16 or 17. Nobody with level 4 epics and level 3 legendaries should be allowed in silver shield, i dont care if they deranked so they were under 9000 elo at the end of the season. My level 20 was in legendary arena for like 3 months before i had a lvl 4 epic. And ive seen a lot of good ideas/suggestions to not encourage derankers andnof course i have my own suggestions. First, if you make it to legendary and drop down to silver shield when the season resets, I think you should only be able to do this once. If you malenit back to legendary again, you stay there regardless of your elo at the end of the month. Secondly, when you are in legendary, the match making algorithm needs to change. I think when ita finding opponents it needs to take in account the other players deck and cards he’ using. Maybe some kind of scoring system, each card depending on the rarity, and level/upgrades, gets a certain amount of points. Then it matches you up with another player within the same realm as you.
    Share this post

  8. #8
    Matchingmaking system is bad and deranking is rampant. Don’t expect changes.
    Share this post

  9. #9
    I lika......do.........da cha cha
    Share this post

  10. #10
    ScottOld's Avatar Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    1,972
    once again derankers, can RL please read up on the ELO system and how it works, and do it properly, ever heard of ELO injection? use that system to match people with similar level cards together so, deranking means NOTHING, I was top 1500 hovering around 2000 now stuck in a rut of lame decks around 3000 because of derankers.
    Share this post