Clash is lame | Forums

[Balrog-]

^

[Balrog-]

*shields are lame

[Zoro]

Thanks for sharing the feedback, care to explain why you feel this way?

[feffreyfeffrey]

Thanks for sharing the feedback, care to explain why you feel this way?

Its because he must be on console where Macros are dominate and her sub-machine gun is OP

[Grimsdottirr]

How the hell do you program macros onto a controller?

[feffreyfeffrey]

How the hell do you program macros onto a controller?

Very easy get an adapter

[Bogdanov89]

Her electrocute range feels too long.

At the same time the melee range of attackers feels like its 2+ meters - they can often melee hit my shield while FAR beyond the arm length.

[Balrog-]

I don't like any of the operators with a face-shield in a game that is all about head-shots. Dying to a shielded operator always feels bad. Never do I think, "That shielded operator has some skills! Nice play."

[Balrog-]

I can see it's a tough balance because Siege is also about communication. And that's where operators like Clash and Montagne come in. Although Clash's slow is super annoying and feels overpowered. I would like to see all operators with a faceshield have a lower killing potential, and be more about communication than killing.

[Major2]

I think players hate on Clash so much because 98% of the people playing Siege don't work together. Clash solo sucks, at least she does on PS4. The swap to her underpowered weapons is so slow you have almost zero chance of wining one on one. But if you have a smart Clash and teammates smart enough to work off of her, she can be a devastating anchor. If you buff her shield to gun speed she would probably be OP and I'm not sure making her little uzi full auto will help much. Either way, I'd hate to see her become just another operator that guys just run around with going 1v1. She's a team op.