Yes, I was specifically talking about 1vs1 encounters. I always tend to do that with saying it directly, my bad.
What I meant by people looking at pro tier lists to much, is that in comparison to the win matrices they are irrelevant for most players. Example: Mid level console players coming to the forum and complain about how weak Aramusha is, because that is what he/she heard and that's what they want to believe. But for most players the matrix data actually is relevant, because most players play on console and most players aren't in platinum and above.
Another thing most people don't mention is that only a fraction of the player base actually contribute to the data in Duel. This is something I have talked about earlier, as I think it's important to get the whole community to participate in Duels. It would improve the matchmaking immensely.
Well the objective fact still is that Aramusha is a weak duelist and a very average team hero. Objectively his feats don't give him much of any kind of team effectiveness or synergy and his kit is below average when compared to reworked vanilla heroes, DLC heroes Shaman and Highlander, all the Wu Lin and Black Prior. He is not an easy character to do well with unlike other heroes who are simply much easier to be a threat with - primarily characters with relatively safe unblockables and/or synergistic feats.Originally Posted by Tyrjo Go to original post
Aramusha is one of the characters that is emblematic of a benchmark for player skill progression in For Honor. To players who have not yet passed this skill benchmark he is like an oppressive end game Dark Souls boss. But to players who do progress beyond this skill hurdle he is never again a credible threat to them.
I absolutely agree that people shouldn't just take a tier list as gospel. The context of a tier list is what people should be looking at when determining how useful it is to them. However, the fact that pretty much every hero is viable at the average skill level should not be used as the basis for judging which characters are strong and which are weak because at that skill level the objective power of a hero's entire tool kit is largely irrelevant.
They did show us the duel data for the whole playerbase that had played regular unranked duel consistently during the Season. You can't really ask for more than that because there will always be people that just don't want to play a 1v1 mode let alone playing the more intensely competitive ranked version.Originally Posted by Tyrjo Go to original post
The objective fact is that Aramusha is a weak duelist in the higher tiers. Another objective fact, as you said, is that Aramusha can be oppressive below those tiers for people who don't know how to shut him down. That is the reason why the statistics look like they do.
My point was not to determine that Aramusha is a strong hero in general, but that players who haven't hit that glass ceiling yet with him actually should perform well with him. Meaning if you are in gold/silver skill and complain about not being able to win with Aramusha, you are doing something wrong, because other players seem to do well with him in those tiers.
Aramousha also shows better in 4v4 for a couple reasons.
1) If you arent focused on him (he is a secondary attacker) his infinite chain and damage potential he can chip at a player very well and apply good pressure.
2) He is one of the top minion/pikeman killer in the game right now. In dominion you throw him mid and he can clear out faster than most which takes mid sooner which results in more points.
Remember playing objective is how you win. Push the ram and kill pikeman. Slaughter minion and hold zones. He does this very well and highly effects win rates. This is true without factoring how good/awful he is in 1v1 on heroes. If he is surrounded by pikeman his own pike man and stays in the pack it also helps any 1v1.
So im not surprised aramousha is high tier in 4v4 stats. People forget 4v4 isnt only about ganking and KD even though some people play it that way.
As for duel, at lower skill his infinite chain is hard to deal with especially with those soft feints. I used to have trouble against him till i took the time to learn his kit.
I get'cha. Fair point.Originally Posted by Tyrjo Go to original post
Should mention that while what you are saying has a fair bit to do with it Aramusha actually has some nice factors in dom. He's semi decent at target swapping with his infinite combo and deadly feints. His infinite combo actually makes him pretty great at constantly destroying the enemy teams minions. Finally he has some pretty nutty damage for punishes and his heavies in general being hard to GB due to their low vulnerability windows. I suppose his BB is also decent at dealing with unlocked attacks. Not saying Mushu is amazing by any stretch but highlighting his strengths.Originally Posted by Vakris_One Go to original post