🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #11
    Bone_Frog's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,984
    Originally Posted by Hugo-FOU Go to original post
    It was only about 2 1/2 years ago we got them and they were a dream to use. Even better than the glock I use now.
    I think Sig recalled, repaired and replaced them pretty quick. It was a simple engineering flaw if I remember right. It was just embarrassing that it made it past Army trials with such a glaring flaw. As far as being better than Glock. That really isn't that hard. Most pistols shoot better than Glock in my opinion. Glock is just inexpensive(relatively) compared to Sig or HK.
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Hugo-FOU's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    4,661
    Glock is very easy to use. But then my experience is limited to Barreta 92d, Sig 226 the 320 and the Glock.
    Share this post

  3. #13
    The problem with just putting a glock look a like in the game without it saying glock on the gun is that glock not only is a trademark name but the company actually trademarked the shape of the gun, I’d love to see one in the game for my CAG inspired operator but unfortunately probably won’t happen, they didn’t even put arc rails on the airframe. I really don’t understand why they don’t add the cpc plate carrier or avs plate carrier, they obviously already have liscensing from crye
    Share this post