So Andrey822017 says he likes is that Ubisoft tries something new each game, player3069 says that is a laughable, untrue claim, Andrey822017 then proceeds to list examples of what he meant, and player3069 tells him they don't count because apparently he is the one who defines what Andrey meant by 'new'? The Guns for Hire system was new to the franchise, it did not work the same way the buddy system in FC2 or the hired mercs in FC4 worked at all, so you can't even say they're the same.
Takedowns were new in FC3, grappling hooks and gyrocopters were new in FC4, animal taming / use was new in FC primal and using guns for hire was new in FC5. Each game has had something new in terms of gameplay, if you over generalize everything, you can diminish the validity of claim.
Well, after completely ignoring FC for ages, because of the terrible ending of FC5 where the nut cases who horribly abuse and enslave everyone end up being right, I come back to this news. (literally just found out about FC-ND today) For me this is a chance for UBI to put it all right. Either this ends by waking up in a hospital after a bliss fueld nightmare, which you had to go through to help restore your drug disrupted neural pathways back to reality, OR - it opens with the tale of how the deputy escaped Joseph the sh*t bag, and helped other survivors start the rebuilding process of the community, which has now come under threat by the antagonists of this game.
Sorry, bit of a ramble i know, but needed to get it out there.
Boy, that's one compelling argument to not buy the game.Originally Posted by portal_JUMPER21 Go to original post![]()