🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #11
    Originally Posted by Devils-_-legacy Go to original post
    What are you even using to get the information as a reference as the for Honor's own in-game tracker is kinda poor and FHTracker hasn't been updated since MF
    Yes that is what I used. Unless you have a better way of tracking?
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Originally Posted by CRIMS0NM0NKEY Go to original post
    Yes that is what I used. Unless you have a better way of tracking?
    Nope I just wouldn't use the in game version as it's wildly inaccurate.
    Ive always used fh tacker as it doesn't include vs ai /assists/bot kills unless they get a fix it wouldn't trust the ubisoft one
    Share this post

  3. #13
    Originally Posted by Devils-_-legacy Go to original post
    Nope I just wouldn't use the in game version as it's wildly inaccurate.
    Ive always used fh tacker as it doesn't include vs ai /assists/bot kills unless they get a fix it wouldn't trust the ubisoft one
    My Kd was slightly lower probably due to the assists being subjective. I don't play bots much. I made the change in my message if that is considered more accurate.
    Share this post

  4. #14
    UbiInsulin's Avatar Community Manager
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    6,492
    Originally Posted by CRIMS0NM0NKEY Go to original post
    This forum is just ambiguous data without it. Honestly what is the point of sharing your opinion or reading someone else's if you don't even know if it's applicable.
    I'd rather have the ambiguity than see people trying to mathematically rank the value of each other's posts, which sounds like a nightmare. People already search each other on FHtracker when they want to find ammunition to flame with. Integrating this directly into the forums is not something I'd recommend.

    Besides, I rarely see people claim to be more skilled than they are. There's been plenty of threads by players who want the game balanced around more casual play (i.e. their own level of play) rather than competitive.
    Share this post

  5. #15
    Originally Posted by UbiInsulin Go to original post
    I'd rather have the ambiguity than see people trying to mathematically rank the value of each other's posts, which sounds like a nightmare. People already search each other on FHtracker when they want to find ammunition to flame with. Integrating this directly into the forums is not something I'd recommend.

    Besides, I rarely see people claim to be more skilled than they are. There's been plenty of threads by players who want the game balanced around more casual play (i.e. their own level of play) rather than competitive.
    That is perfectly fine. I'm a casual player. It's data. I put all my data on there as best as I could. If I did not what sort of reaction do you think I'd get? What sort of example would I be?

    If people want to leave out what they consider personal that is certainly their prerogative. I completely understand.

    It would be nice to at least know if the person is on PC or console as this pertains to many subjects that come up and is less personal I believe.
    Share this post

  6. #16
    Originally Posted by CRIMS0NM0NKEY Go to original post
    This forum is just ambiguous data without it. Honestly what is the point of sharing your opinion or reading someone else's if you don't even know if it's applicable?
    I can judge if they're talking sense based on my own knowledge of the game and my own perception of the subject being discussed. Also, if I'm wrong, it gives me an opportunity to learn something. It's also a point that having good reactions doesn't necessarily mean somebody is going to talk sense about the game, the direction it should take, or indeed any other particular topic.
    Share this post

  7. #17
    Originally Posted by DefiledDragon Go to original post
    I can judge if they're talking sense based on my own knowledge of the game and my own perception of the subject being discussed. Also, if I'm wrong, it gives me an opportunity to learn something. It's also a point that having good reactions doesn't necessarily mean somebody is going to talk sense about the game, the direction it should take, or indeed any other particular topic.
    Your perception is based on information.
    Share this post

  8. #18
    Originally Posted by CRIMS0NM0NKEY Go to original post
    Your perception is based on information.
    Yeah, of course it is, but how good a player was at the game would likely not change my perception. I'm not opposed to the idea of people waving their e-peens if they so choose, but I think that it would be folly to equate it's size with the value of their opinions.
    Share this post

  9. #19
    Vakris_One's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    3,449
    Originally Posted by CRIMS0NM0NKEY Go to original post
    This forum is just ambiguous data without it. Honestly what is the point of sharing your opinion or reading someone else's if you don't even know if it's applicable?
    It's rather simple really, at least in my opinion. If a person is talking sense then they're talking sense and I will be more inclined to hear what they have to say. I don't need to see their in-game statistics or their gaming CV or the size of their majestic e-peen to decide whether they're worth listening to or not. What they write and how they express themselves will be the judge of that.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by DefiledDragon Go to original post
    Yeah, of course it is, but how good a player was at the game would likely not change my perception. I'm not opposed to the idea of people waving their e-peens if they so choose, but I think that it would be folly to equate it's size with the value of their opinions.
    Isn't that exactly what ubisoft is doing when modeling the game after competitive play?
    Share this post