Solid argument ... it perfectly fits in their balancing patterns.Originally Posted by HighWithEagle Go to original post
Lawbringer and Shugoki should be on top of their priority list.
Raider is not "fine" by any means, but still one step above LB and Shug.
Unfortunately I am a fanatic LB main, and having hin this weak really reduces my Breach fun, eventhough he is way better in 4vs4 then in 1vs1. But often I face 1vs1 in Breach since the maps are so big (which is basically a good thing).
What does lawbringers have? Shove on block and all three options after that are easy to deal with. Lawbringer has no hyper armor, no deflects and no bleed attacks. His shove on block is just an annoyance and that's all lawbringer is right now sadly. An annoyance.Originally Posted by yfkutfui Go to original post
your evading the question, you are the one who claimed the Raider was in a far better spot than the LB, i listed what he (Raider) has and asked you how he is better than the LB?Originally Posted by HighWithEagle Go to original post
you didn't answer because you don't have one, it seems fashionable to hate on the Raider but the fact is he has absolutely nothing, a crap move set and crap feats, the fact that he does as well as he does is a testament to the people who play him, doing a lot with very little, the LB does have more in my opinion, the pierce, the pancake flip, the shove, more bombs than a B52, a large HP pool, lets just say they both need attention, claiming that the Raider is better though is not true or fair.
Pancake flip huh? That thing hit one time out of 10 tries and is punished by free GB you know.Originally Posted by yfkutfui Go to original post
Also please don't forget that Raider have hyper armor on stunning tap, which is much easier to use than shove since it is a dodge attack and a light coming from zone and heavies soft feints. Raider is also the only hero in For Honor with a dodge guardbreak
1/10 times??Originally Posted by Armosias Go to original post
That would even be an improvement!
Raider has his out of stamina mix ups, higher damage output and an unblockable from neutral. And his stunning tap lands more often then a LB shove from neutral.
Raider is better then Lawbringer.
Both need a rework, but LB needs it harder, and this is also what every top tier player says.
I think my brain just might fall out, people actually believe Lawbringer > Raider
They both are in need of reworks, but LB's kit is abysmal when compared to Raider's. Again, LB has ONE move that keeps him from falling flat on his face (shove on block) and some people still have the nerve to complain about it in his current state.
I play both and it is much easier at least for me to play as Raider. Seems faster, better stamina , more useful moves overall which force enemy's reaction. With LB, it is very hard to do anything other than turtle and pray for your friends to come.
Look at that new heavy for God's sake. He is basically LB that can move fast as Nobushi with a lot of useful attacks and unblocakbles.
But to be fair, not only LB is severely damaged by new perk system. Conq, Shugo, Warlord, Valk are also not in greatest position.
Unfortunately I love halberds and impressive plate armour ... and this sucker has both of it :/Originally Posted by Hormly Go to original post
If he just also had a viable kit ...