A serious problem with this system.
I don't know if this is the only place the For Honor team goes to look at for suggestions and feedback, but even if it is, it doesn't excuse my complaint.
We're asked for feedback, then laughed at when we give it. Then changes are made that no one wanted or asked for. What's the point of it all? Lawbringer has no openers. Shugoki has the same problem, and he ALSO doesn't have any useful punishes compared to basically every other character in the game. Conq's raw shield bash is ridiculously difficult to punish compared to other character's bashes.
So many people have been making these statements and more, but they're just teased and ignored while the developers decide to buff a character that HAS openers, defensive options, mobility, high damage, and counter-attack potential.
If you won't listen to us, at least don't make fun of us for telling you what we think after you asked.
I love this game. There isn't an experience out there that can replicate it. I know it can't be perfect, but there is consensus within the community on what would be good, and that general consensus is almost completely ignored in favor of what? Buffing peacekeeper? Claiming the weakest heroes in the game are fine? Are the only people you listen to apathetic internal testers?
I'm sorry. Just, we're in the dark.
3 people found this helpful