State of Balance - Season 6 | Forums

[iAGA_Jeshi]

The fact you dont agree with me dont mean this is incorrect.

I am far To be the only one believing Raider is not garbage.

Say you can dispell argue how much you want.. but i am.not going To explain you again things i've already explain to someone who says that a buff for 1v1 doesnt not makes him better in 4v4. And then now stats are not a fact . . Ok ok.

I know very how he is view by the community .. not good in 1v1 but a beast in 4v4 but it doesn't change my mind.

Thé fact guys as charmz or Champion have comment on my side on this just confort me in my opinion .

Funny how a Guy rep37 believe he is good .. Master ? Agaisnt player who are rep 20-40 .. And you think you're good ? Just arrogant.

Come back at rep 100 and more saying you still Master and then beat some ytubers or best ppl.

We are obviously not at the same level as on my side i've been matched in game with Guy as Tom Legend or I AM RSSS which. .You can check on fhtr are in the top 10 ppl.

Again nothing you say makes any sense.In ranked they match you up with people of all reps. Since Im ranked high I only play people with reps 50-200
So that point you made about me playing low reps were invalid. And the people high in ranked know how to play the game. Even abuse some mechanics.

You saying that two people who were also incorrect have your back is also irrevant.
You still haven't told me how my buffs would make him overpowered.

The buffs that he would receive would in no way make him Op in 4v4 his main strengths are zone and stampede which isnt getting touched. So regardless of the buff he would always do the same thing in 4v4.

And yes the stats the the devs put up are indeed inaccurate because it includes all the new players, the ones who got the game for free and tested it for a bit. All of that is included in this.

All you are doing is saying nonsense. Hate to break it to you but raider isn't a good hero. The way you're talking its as if you've haven't played the game since launch.

Again all you've done is type nonsense and spread incorrect information.

You are welcome to try to debate the buffs I proposed for raider whenever you want. Try to bring up an actual point or instances in which he would be OP.

You saying raider isn't garbage is hilarious. Thats like saying lawbringer is a good hero.

Thanks
#Balance

[Specialkha]

In 1v1, raider is not strong, he is below average. What makes him strong in 4v4 is Steampede charge and zone. Obviously, any kind of buff to its 1v1 capacity will make him stronger in 4v4 overall.

[iAGA_Jeshi]

In 1v1, raider is not strong, he is below average. What makes him strong in 4v4 is Steampede charge and zone. Obviously, any kind of buff to its 1v1 capacity will make him stronger in 4v4 overall.

Exactly but it wouldnt make him op. His main tools are stampede and his zone. The buffs I proposed would in no way make him op in 4v4. Simply more viable overall.

[TheTool85]

This guy doesn't have enough respect to do so saddly..

Uhmm.. you mean me with this guy? Sorry if i did offend you, still i don't know why you should b3 offended by this post of mine. Will you please tell me what i did wrong?

[Illyrian_King]

Feels like Lawbringer won't see daylight for a loooong long time ;b

[Siegfried-Z]

Again nothing you say makes any sense.In ranked they match you up with people of all reps. Since Im ranked high I only play people with reps 50-200
So that point you made about me playing low reps were invalid. And the people high in ranked know how to play the game. Even abuse some mechanics.

You saying that two people who were also incorrect have your back is also irrevant.
You still haven't told me how my buffs would make him overpowered.

The buffs that he would receive would in no way make him Op in 4v4 his main strengths are zone and stampede which isnt getting touched. So regardless of the buff he would always do the same thing in 4v4.

And yes the stats the the devs put up are indeed inaccurate because it includes all the new players, the ones who got the game for free and tested it for a bit. All of that is included in this.

All you are doing is saying nonsense. Hate to break it to you but raider isn't a good hero. The way you're talking its as if you've haven't played the game since launch.

Again all you've done is type nonsense and spread incorrect information.

You are welcome to try to debate the buffs I proposed for raider whenever you want. Try to bring up an actual point or instances in which he would be OP.

You saying raider isn't garbage is hilarious. Thats like saying lawbringer is a good hero.

Thanks
#Balance

And again you're just an arrogant guy.
Again speaking line your words are godlike .
Again putting stupid flashy title on your post.

I can do it to and we could continue To have this officiel thread as our personnal discussion.

First, i said **** about the rep and level match correlation just in order To see you saying the opposite thing you said before .
You said that my rank is ridiculous for someone playing as much as me .. but then after your last post You agree reps means nothing with level (just a bit) and then you said stupid things just To trash talk me again .
And, diamond 2 is very close To master so dont be ridiculous saying this is a noob rank.

Also, it is again only you who said the 2 others were wrong .. but man you're the man not listening and not Reading. . Just sticking at your same words post after post.

As i already said Raider doesn't need a buff.

He is a Monster for what he is design to be.

You firstly talk To makes lights faster plus less stam cons and HA and new chain etc etc

My purpose is he doesnt need it .
Or if Yes, then he deserved a zone nerf .. You like to use the Word balance.. then this is balance.

Balance a char is not buffing him in terms of speed, stam, mooveset, HA etc with no nerf in another hand while he is the 4v4 king already.

That's my opinion and a lot of players are really tired of his broken unlock zone .

You want to know who speaks nonsense :
-1v1 buff doesn't mean makes hum stronger in 4v4
-raider is pure garbage
-charmz and champion are saying ******** too
-stats are not To take in consideration at all
-spreading insults at everyone who disagree but falling in love To a Guy just saying agree for faster light 😅

And to answer you, LB is still good in 4v4.

Anyway, you gonna answer with another arrogant post which not gonna get an answer from me.

Dont have time for a rep37 Guy thinking he is the only true opinion arround there .

[Siegfried-Z]

Uhmm.. you mean me with this guy? Sorry if i did offend you, still i don't know why you should b3 offended by this post of mine. Will you please tell me what i did wrong?

No no not you man the other spreading insult all arround. Dont worry

[ChampionRuby50g]

Lol so I’m in the top 1% of players on Xbox globally, yet I don’t know what I’m talking about and it’s my fault the game isn’t progressing. Thanks for making me laugh this morning.

In 1v1, yes Raider is lacking. I could get behind 500ms lights for him. But in 4v4 he is a must pick for any team that wants to be sweaty. One stampede charge, with one enemy around = dead.

Whiff stunning tap, unlock the zone to a different target, deal 50+ or more damage in revenge = beast mode.

I have 180 reps, but please, tell me more about how I know nothing and ruin this game. Your posts seem more like the biased, mindless raving of someone who is in the deep end.

[Siegfried-Z]

Lol so I’m in the top 1% of players on Xbox globally, yet I don’t know what I’m talking about and it’s my fault the game isn’t progressing. Thanks for making me laugh this morning.

In 1v1, yes Raider is lacking. I could get behind 500ms lights for him. But in 4v4 he is a must pick for any team that wants to be sweaty. One stampede charge, with one enemy around = dead.

Whiff stunning tap, unlock the zone to a different target, deal 50+ or more damage in revenge = beast mode.

I have 180 reps, but please, tell me more about how I know nothing and ruin this game. Your posts seem more like the biased, mindless raving of someone who is in the deep end.

This guy is just lost in his wrong believings and prefer saying stats and experiments players feedbacks are just wrong after 37rep in the game... 😒😒

[CandleInTheDark]

And yes the stats the the devs put up are indeed inaccurate because it includes all the new players, the ones who got the game for free and tested it for a bit. All of that is included in this.

Not weighing in on the rest of it but you're wrong there. 1v1 takes the top 2.5%, 4v4 takes the top 4%. The chart shows the heroes in the hands of people at the highest and roughly of equal skill level.