Junior Member
Holy **** Ghost War sucks and no one is playing this game in PVP.
seriously.
look at Twitch.
No one is playing Ghost War.
Why is, probably the best open world tactical game with ****ing amazing graphics amazing vehicles amazing game design amazing combat mechanics - why oh dear baby jesus why is it so crippled by a piece of **** 4V4 PVP arcade version, watered down from the incredible game that is Wildlands.
GHOST MODE is great except for the really stupid accidental suicides that you guys wont fix - fine. Campaign mode is absolutely awesome and the weapons, and having to get them all - is also great. But who the hell is supposed to be playing Ghost War? It's literally like playing an alpha demo of a potential version of a micro teeny tiny portion of Wildlands.
bring on the ******ed comments and deflect away.
If Wildlands Campaign cost $150 and Ghost War cost $4.99, I would buy Wildlands. Every year.
You can't GIVE this PVP away, let alone attempt to build a community on it.
Are you guys confused about your audience or what? cuz ur missing the mark by a few kilometers.
(heres a ****ing wild though someone should pitch in a meeting with a sense of creativity - YOU ALREADY HAVE PUBG BUILT - JUST ADD THE ONLINE MULTIPLAYER ABILITY AND THIS **** WILL BLOW UP ON TWITCH WHY HAS NO ONE SAID THIS) wtf
Senior Member
Senior Member
Member
Here's a crazy idea - maybe because this game was never meant to be a PvP shooter, focusing instead on PvE and co-op? Could that be it? If people want PvP, they play Battlefield or Cod or CS or whatever. If they want decent PvE, they play this. So how about we NOT try to turn this game into another battle royale clone, and if someone wants to play PUBG - guess what? They actually can play PUBG.Originally Posted by BRAVOSNIPER1347 Go to original post
Let the devs focus on what this game really needs - more variety in weaponry and, first and foremost, randomized missions for replayability. Oh, and bugs. Fixed, not added.
Member
Junior Member
it amaaaaaazes me how you fanboys resist improvements and think Ghost War PVP is playable.
youre ****ing nuts. no one is playing PVP.
so how the hell can you defend it... soon enough, you will have no one to play against... so will you play what you referred me to go play? or will you realize, oh, boy, no one is playing, and now im all alone, hey wow maybe this PVP mode sucks!
PVE for Campaign and Ghost Mode could be SOOO ****ING AMAZING. but its capped at 4 players and still buggy - missions - suicides for no reason (cars, choppers, boats).
i welcomed you to tell me to go **** off - keep it coming - it literally helps explain why no one is playing PVP and why less and less people are playing Campaign/Ghost Mode.
How the hell can you guys say Hey shutup just go play PUBG instead of being like - oh wow - a new game type for people that might want to play the game that way - that sounds cool.
if there was a $150 annual fee to play this game on a huge PVE scale, i would pay it. that would be epic. 24PVE. 64PVE. EPIC.
but instead "we are focused on 4PVP"..... great! drive the customers away!
dont forget.... THIS IS A ****ING GAME. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE FUN. not repetitive or feel like a micro teeny tiny version of what it actually is.
why is there no whole-province map with 12v12 with little birds, where 2 teams battle to control flagged villages or race through provinces?
feels like a ton of incredibly talented people built an incredible machine, but the machine was designed the whole time for two people to limit what the machine can do - only 1% of the machine is actually used... but we all bought the whole machine, and now no one wants the machine anymore.
i paid for the game but im not paying for the next one until im proven wrong and we get an awesome PVE experience and PVP experience that doesnt get old after a few days.
Senior Member
Why not both?
I agree (somewhat) with the Ops sentiments. PvP in this game should be a huge draw for people to get involved with Co-op. But it isn't and it's not really the devs fault tbh. Milsim enthusiasts that don't embrace PvP.. like W.T.A.F!?
If I was a dev I'd be like, "yeah, we need to take a beat on this.." Not against milsim elements, just don't think it should dominate development.
Member
Uh, mate, are you having a conversation with yourself or did you get your threads mixed up? Because not a single person here said anything about PvP being playable (the general sentiment is that it's not really enjoyable) and practically everyone said this game needs to be fixed and improved upon. Aside from that, there are literally HUNDREDS of threads asking for and suggesting said improvements. So I really have no clue where you got your "the community loves PvP and hates updates" theory from.Originally Posted by BRAVOSNIPER1347 Go to original post
Guess the major peeve you seem to have here is that no one patted your back for suggesting turning this game into yet another battle royale game. You have the right to express your opinion (which you did), people have the right to respond with theirs (which they did). So how about you accept that and keep the insults to yourself? :]
Member
Senior Member
