Hi here i am with the regular buff pk damage a little please | Forums

[Arekonator]

Implying devs dont have their own more accurate data.
Implying my sarcasm wasnt also correct.
FH tracker data have been proven innacurate to put it mildly.
Go on, ignore me for pointing out holes in your statements, that says a lot about you.

[Charmzzz]

Eliminate LB feat spam boom balanced, reduce damage taken while in raiders carry and have it so you can get hit out of his carry like with shamans bite maybe some more stamina drain on misses balanced.
kensei is in an alright place if anything i would just like his dodge heavies to be dodge lights damage wise but i really dont care if they do anything to him. Conq is common knowledge.

Its starting to look like you struggle reading and comprehending. My statement was saying everyone has their own heros they struggle against. Some people think aramusha is godly and while alot of people dont. I think glad is a strong character, alot of people may not. But its obvious that you dont struggle against anything in this game and are the best person to ever play it so i guess thats why you didnt understandy original statement.

No **** you "eat pks for breakfast" zerk is the best character ingame. So congrats man you switched from one S tier hero to another. When zerk gets nerfed, what S tier character are you going to run to next?

And no i knew id get some crybaby to come along and react and i was obviously right since you responded. If my crybaby pk mains statement offends you then its more than likely true and you need to grow up.

I don't care about special snowflakes who have problems against a low Winrate Character. It is obvious that those are personal inabilities. But if some Characters pull off a 55+% Winrate in any Mode among the Top 2.5% Players (concerning Skill Rating) - there is definitely something wrong with that Character. LB, Kensei, Zerker, Conq, Shaman and Raider are these Characters at the moment. No, I am NOT the best Player. I never said something like this. I personally struggle against a good Valk because I face them so rarely, and I struggle against all the above mentioned Characters. This has NO connection to what I am saying, if a Character has a much higher Winrate there HAS to be a problem. That is a statistical fact.

Gladiator is sh*t, he is winning around 45% of all his Matches (be it Dom or Duel). So calling him strong is plain bs. I would never call Valk strong, yet I struggle against her. But I know that Statistics show how bad she is, how hard it is to win with her. This will be true for PK in the next Season Recap, I am sure.

To add to this: they nerfed PK having a 58% Duel Winrate but a mediocre Dominion Winrate in S4. Now, LB and Raider always had a 54+% Winrate in Dominion, yet no Nerfs. Then comes Conq pulling off a 60% Duel Winrate in S5 - no Nerf in sight. Do you UNDERSTAND me being upset now?

I think YOU have trouble reading. You did not respond to ANY of my arguments, you just keep insulting me. Zerk is not the "best Character in the game" - Conq is at the moment. I will switch to any Character I think is fun, that's why I kept playing Gladiator and Warden even if they are terribad. But sometimes I wanna play something that is able to keep up when I face Stampede - spamming Raiders in Dom like you...

You insulted everyone who calls for a buff on PK as a "crybaby PK main". That's why I reported you. I couldn't care less about a no-skill Stampede spammer, so...

Using win rate stats to decided who neeed and who don't need buuf/nerf is DUMB

Those stat are made by 100% of the community... the same people that are asking for nerf instantly when they can't fight a character.... 80% of these peoples have NEVER parryed a light once in their life !!... most of them have trouble parrying a heavy...

You let them play together and of course those who play assassins between them are gonna win...

Doesn't need to be a genius to realise this

Using Winrates from the Top 2.5% (Duel) / Top 4% (Dominion) is the BEST way to determine how strong a Character is in reality. If they take Data out of, let's say, 1 Million Matches, from the highest Skillrating Players, don't you think that these Statistics are much more reliable than anything else? Btw it is NOT an Assassin topping the Charts at the moment. It is Conq in Duel (60%) and Lawbringer in Dominion (54%).

You seem to have little knowledge about Statistics.

Here is the explanation how they gather the Data:

Below is a Matrix of all the 1v1 matches made by the top 2.5% players on PC and Console combined (according to our skill rating) of For Honor. In terms of data it’s the closet thing we have to inform us about the competitive level of For Honor in 1v1.

4v4 DATA
Here is the win rate in 4v4 Dominion for the top 4% players on PC and Console combined according to our skill rating system.

You’ll notice that the population % is not the same as for Duel. It’s because we want to get a population high enough in the ranking while being large enough to get relevant data.