Neither do I. It doesn't make any sense to be able to have multiple dialogue options. You can't rewrite history. AC is not about time travel. Using some elements of the Witcher series is fine, but why use something that doesn't make any sense for AC? I hope the game is not just a Witcher rip off.Originally Posted by MnemonicSyntax Go to original post
Originally Posted by MnemonicSyntax Go to original postWell it could make sense if you desync when choosing the wrong dialog optionsOriginally Posted by SHADOWGARVIN Go to original post
I loved AC Unity, still the most beautiful and immersive city in any game i played so far. It had technical issues but they were fixed later on.
And i think Greece is the logical and optimal sequel to the Egypt setting.
Something surprises me (even if for me we could not find a better theme than the Greeks): the warriors on the video wear Corinthian style helmets (Italian Corinthians), it is also the symbol of the logo. The symbol "lambda", refers to the Spartan army mainly (hence the wink for the kick).
On the other hand, if Bayek is at the origin of the creation of the brotherhood, and if the history happens after him, then towards the end of the 1st century BC and 1st after that it is not logical. Greece, of which Sparte under Rome was no more than the shadow of its former prestige. They were no longer really active in the war, and the kind of Corinthian helmets had evolved since then.
It seems to be well before bayek! The great Spartan and Greek wars in general took place in the classical and Hellenistic era (from 500 to 150 BC!). Surprised, but very pleased anyway with this decision that it will happen in greece. We will see perhaps the battle of thermopylae, the greco-perisan wars! Rejoice