🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #231
    1. Global "Special Outfits" especially with ghost mode I'm tired of having to set my appearance manually every single time. It would be super convenient to be able to have it automatically set your last used appearance or a global saved special outfit that you can quickly revert back to.

    2. Remove mouse over selection on appearance items would be nice. I hate accidentally bumping my mouse or something and it switching everything I was choosing.

    3. Grid layout of camo selections would be ULTRA convenient. Instead of having to scroll through the entire list to get to the camo you want for your appearance items having them in a grid fashion so you can just quickly selected with the mouse.
    Share this post

  2. #232
    In fact , I would also like to have the capacity to repair vehiculesd (like cars, helicopters and so on ...).

    Maybe in special locatiopns only like garages or petrol stations or maybe with a special tool ( like in Far Cry 5 ). It's a bit anoying to have to change your car every time you are in a fight ...
    Share this post

  3. #233

    No SJW BS! Archangel mission sucks and is a buggy mess!

    First off I wanna say I LOVE Ubisoft games for the most part....... But things in the VG world are getting out of hand. Stop with the pandering to chicks in predominantly male focused games. Make games for women if that's the direction we're going. Archangel lezbian mission sucks and is a frustrating buggy mess. I absolutely LOVE GR Wildlands but I'm sensing a heavy push on female characters lately which is unbelievable and just plain silly. A few are ok but it's getting waaay out of hand. The fact that I have the CHOICE to make M/F characters is a huge plus. The archangel mission is so broken and full of uninteresting lesbian innuendo characters that I didn't even finish the mission because I just couldn't look past the annoying bugs enough to care about a couple of super lesbian R6 operators. It's just not believable. As an avid Battlefied player since BF 1942 I won't be buying Battlefield V.....and that's a shame. Not because of the fridiculous steampunk Sally female character but because of the whole lootbox customizable ****e. It just doesn't belong in WW2. A future setting would have been fine for this but WW2 is pervasive to do this in. And the studio response from DICE/EA to berade and call it's fans bigots, racists and masogonists is disgusting corporate behaviour. Please Ubisoft don't fall into this corporate scam. Please respect and do right by your fans. As an avid Division player I am unsure if I am even going to buy Division 2 because of how you ruined the DZ with your last patch. The addition of the rope (and the ability to cut it) was bloody brilliant and fun. Then you made going rogue a button press that everybody can see and it just takes away from the whole experience. Me and my entire 3 man squad who put hundreds of hrs into that game haven't played it since. That patch was a DZ game killer. And to anyone who was crying about people stealing their loot in the DarkZone oh boo hoo go play PvE because not knowing whos friend or foe is the whole meta of the DZ! Anyways what I am trying to say is please don't follow the silly SJW trend or I won't be buying your games anymore either. First EA and Star Wars/Disney franchises are not getting my money anymore.....please don't make Ubisoft on that list as well
    Share this post

  4. #234

    Expanded Squad Size

    You guys have done a phenomenal job in creating this game. The year 2 update is nuts (I've definitely dropped over $120 on DLC content #whoopsies) and I'm so stoked to see what's coming up for the next two updates.

    Being apart of a growing milsim community, we chat all the time about the possibility of expanded squads. I mean we think well, "ghost war allows 8 plus an observer - I wonder if we can see that in campaign or ghost mode" (which is friggen unreal - screw all that hate on the permadeath). I believe the milsim community would absolutely lose it as it would expand operations to allow for immersive piloting experiences and/or things like scout/sniper teams or support teams - allowing for a more tactical experience. It would be unreal.

    If it can't happen because it would require some crazy overhaul in the game, totally understandable, but do you think we could know if this could be implemented in a future Q&A? I know a lot of people would love to know the answer - and maybe an addition to future Ghost Recon's!

    Thanks for creating the greatest game we have access to on console. In the midst of all this futuristic COD stuff out there, this is where it's at. Please make a sequel. Please please please make a sequel.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  5. #235
    Things I'd love to happen to the game:

    the LVOA-C added so we can actually customize it

    The black and gray palette on the Crye Precision shirt to be swapped so that the gray is on the torso and the black is on the arms.
    The white and light gray palette on the Crye Precision shirt to be swapped so that the white is on the arms and the light gray is on the torso.

    It's really annoying that the white and black shirts don't look good because the palettes are backwards.

    Better magnification scopes for long range, kind of annoying that the biggest zoom we have is around 8x? Maybe a little less blur/fog of war when sniping from very far way too, I know it's not really realistic for it to be crystal clear but c'mon, make it at least semi-enjoyable it's just a game.

    ALSO FURTHER RENDER DISTANCE WOULD BE GREAT. Tired of playing solo and having enemies stop rendering at like, 500 meters.
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #236
    Considering that the majority of gamers are females they aren't "pandering" to anything but people who want to play/buy their games, which is exactly how marketing works. Game developers are suddenly realizing "wow you can add women to a game and it'll be just fine because women also exist in real life!" if you're going to moan and whine every time something has more females than males then you need to pack up and go elsewhere. It wouldn't have made sense for them to have the mission be about any other operator besides Cav given her back story and history of being a trouble maker. Twitch and Cav are either romantically involved or very close, which would make even more sense as to why they'd send her to get Cav, and Valkyrie is considered a team leader, which makes sense as to why she was running point. They aren't pandering, they're using pre-existing back story to put existing characters into a new world. You think Ubisoft really cares if you don't buy their game? No, they don't, know why? They're still going to make money without you.
    Share this post

  7. #237
    Originally Posted by cooldufus Go to original post
    First off I wanna say I LOVE Ubisoft games for the most part....... But things in the VG world are getting out of hand. Stop with the pandering to chicks in predominantly male focused games. Make games for women if that's the direction we're going. Archangel lezbian mission sucks and is a frustrating buggy mess. I absolutely LOVE GR Wildlands but I'm sensing a heavy push on female characters lately which is unbelievable and just plain silly. A few are ok but it's getting waaay out of hand. The fact that I have the CHOICE to make M/F characters is a huge plus. The archangel mission is so broken and full of uninteresting lesbian innuendo characters that I didn't even finish the mission because I just couldn't look past the annoying bugs enough to care about a couple of super lesbian R6 operators. It's just not believable. As an avid Battlefied player since BF 1942 I won't be buying Battlefield V.....and that's a shame. Not because of the fridiculous steampunk Sally female character but because of the whole lootbox customizable ****e. It just doesn't belong in WW2. A future setting would have been fine for this but WW2 is pervasive to do this in. And the studio response from DICE/EA to berade and call it's fans bigots, racists and masogonists is disgusting corporate behaviour. Please Ubisoft don't fall into this corporate scam. Please respect and do right by your fans. As an avid Division player I am unsure if I am even going to buy Division 2 because of how you ruined the DZ with your last patch. The addition of the rope (and the ability to cut it) was bloody brilliant and fun. Then you made going rogue a button press that everybody can see and it just takes away from the whole experience. Me and my entire 3 man squad who put hundreds of hrs into that game haven't played it since. That patch was a DZ game killer. And to anyone who was crying about people stealing their loot in the DarkZone oh boo hoo go play PvE because not knowing whos friend or foe is the whole meta of the DZ! Anyways what I am trying to say is please don't follow the silly SJW trend or I won't be buying your games anymore either. First EA and Star Wars/Disney franchises are not getting my money anymore.....please don't make Ubisoft on that list as well
    Considering that the majority of gamers are females they aren't "pandering" to anything but people who want to play/buy their games, which is exactly how marketing works. Game developers are suddenly realizing "wow you can add women to a game and it'll be just fine because women also exist in real life!" if you're going to moan and whine every time something has more females than males then you need to pack up and go elsewhere. It wouldn't have made sense for them to have the mission be about any other operator besides Cav given her back story and history of being a trouble maker. Twitch and Cav are either romantically involved or very close, which would make even more sense as to why they'd send her to get Cav, and Valkyrie is considered a team leader, which makes sense as to why she was running point. They aren't pandering, they're using pre-existing back story to put existing characters into a new world. You think Ubisoft really cares if you don't buy their game? No, they don't, know why? They're still going to make money without you.
    Share this post

  8. #238
    AI BLUEFOX's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Pacific
    Posts
    6,832
    Originally Posted by cooldufus Go to original post
    ... things in the VG world are getting out of hand...
    I just ... don't have enough faces or palms to adequately face palm.
     2 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  9. #239
    Originally Posted by cooldufus Go to original post
    First off I wanna say I LOVE Ubisoft games for the most part......
    There. I edited for you so that you do not make an *** of yourself. You're welcome.

    There's been a lot of talk about realism in the forum about female warriors. Also there's like a bazziollion ways for the BFV main character to be female.. Easiest being that she's in SOE.
    Share this post

  10. #240
    KunninPlanz's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    The Darkside
    Posts
    304
    - Perhaps some kind of garage feature so we can have limited customisation on vehicles, such as swapping out the miniguns for 50 cals or LMG's (each with their own stats, with the LMG's being middle ground), maybe changing paint schemes too.

    - A large number of vehicles in-game appear to be missing the ability to ride as passenger in certain parts of the vehicle. For example, one of the Pickup truck types clearly has space for a person to sit in the back (like the armed Unidad buggy), but there is no option to sit in the back. We also cannot, but should be able to, lay prone as a passenger on the back of the flat-bed trucks.

    - The extra drone types from Fallen Ghosts need to be brought over to the main campaign, as the weapons were.

    - Wildlands currently lacks LMG's and shotguns in comparison to quantity of other weapon types. We need more.

    - Also, several weapons need to be correctly resized: the MP7 is too large; the stock on the M4 is too large; etc

    - And I'll say it again because it's of utmost importance: Bipods! :P
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post