🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The Rainbow Six Siege forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #11
    Nsonata, That's not a bad idea, but it's gotta be a thin strip for balance. In reality, a person could take either 1 bullet and be killed, or potentially 10, and still not die. Depends entirely on the person, where they were shot, etc. but it doesn't even have to be in a vital place.

    But a headshot should always kill in Siege, without fail.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Originally Posted by JackLively Go to original post
    Nsonata, That's not a bad idea, but it's gotta be a thin strip for balance. In reality, a person could take either 1 bullet and be killed, or potentially 10, and still not die. Depends entirely on the person, where they were shot, etc. but it doesn't even have to be in a vital place.

    But a headshot should always kill in Siege, without fail.
    should neck shots count as well cause I've noticed that some ops don't have a hit box on their chins cough cough jackal.
    Share this post

  3. #13
    Im confused are you wanting multiple bullets in the head to get a kill? Or are you wanted the players who fire one bullet and hit you in the head to stop?
    Share this post

  4. #14
    @USMCDEVILDOG010 - Well in reality being shot in the neck would completely debilitate you or even kill you. (Unless it's a graze on the side or something.) For realism purposes, I'd say a neckshot should kill too. Imagine being shot, in the neck and just flatout walking it off and surviving the rest of the match unhindered?
    Share this post

  5. #15
    If it took more than 1 headshot to kill a player then the game would be easier.

    This means more people could play it. More money for Ubisoft.

    Therefore, this is a change we will see at some point.
    Share this post

  6. #16
    Originally Posted by JackLively Go to original post
    Why is this even up for consideration... a headshot should always be a 1 hit kill.
    Don't get me wrong here just trying to help explain what I think might be the other sides view point. ( I voted FOR 1SHS )
    In cases like Tachanka where he wears a Steel Helmet it would from a logical standpoint take more than one bullet to penetrate that kind of helmet.
    Share this post

  7. #17
    Originally Posted by JackLively Go to original post
    @USMCDEVILDOG010 - Well in reality being shot in the neck would completely debilitate you or even kill you. (Unless it's a graze on the side or something.) For realism purposes, I'd say a neckshot should kill too. Imagine being shot, in the neck and just flatout walking it off and surviving the rest of the match unhindered?
    Actually Neckshots have been counted as headshots since season 5 I believe.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  8. #18
    Originally Posted by FindFixFinish Go to original post
    If it took more than 1 headshot to kill a player then the game would be easier.

    This means more people could play it. More money for Ubisoft.

    Therefore, this is a change we will see at some point.
    No they would end up losing money because its a core mechanic that brings ppl from others games. They'd end up losing a huge part of their base that they wouldn't recoup from new sales. Aside from the somewhat desturctablity and the one shot headshot its really not any different from cods search and destroy or bf hardlines small squad based game modes.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  9. #19
    Originally Posted by Aurockson Go to original post
    Don't get me wrong here just trying to help explain what I think might be the other sides view point. ( I voted FOR 1SHS )
    In cases like Tachanka where he wears a Steel Helmet it would from a logical standpoint take more than one bullet to penetrate that kind of helmet.
    I would say you're right but if I remember correctly the original op made a thread complaining about flicks and random headshots before. Also if we're going by that logic a nitro should cut through Monty shield like wasn't there.
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by JackLively Go to original post
    @USMCDEVILDOG010 - Well in reality being shot in the neck would completely debilitate you or even kill you. (Unless it's a graze on the side or something.) For realism purposes, I'd say a neckshot should kill too. Imagine being shot, in the neck and just flatout walking it off and surviving the rest of the match unhindered?
    Sorry I was being somewhat fechcious. While I do acknowledge the it should be a one shot kill I was making a joke about how certain ops don't have full hit boxes on their heads jackal is a prime example. Shot him through the jaw while he was on a drone and it hit the wall behind his jaw while not even registering as hitting him.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post