Thoughts on glitches | Forums

[Luckydevil_010]

Yes, the ends justify the means. This is a utilitarian standpoint which easily makes for a better game. Firstly it's a game (the punishment is not real live prison), secondly console is unplayable for about 2 weeks by all those glitchers which shouldn't be protected.

I've played the game for quite a while and the same goes for those I play against, these people that use breaching charges know what they're doing and don't hesitate. To satisfy your protection of the innocent Ubi could make it public ingame that performing the glitch is banable so people have been warned what they should not do.

So you're telling me that you wouldn't be pissed if you got banned for accidentally doing a glitch cause I gotta say I would. During the invisible glitch if I actually had default skins on any of my characters would of accidentally done it several times as I didn't even know what was required to do it while it was still live. And publishing a psa that outlines how to do the glitch in an effort to curb it would just make matters worse. Now I could see them setting up a system that tracks reports over a time period for it so multiple reports in a timeframe with evidence could lead to a ban. I'd be ok with that as there's documented proof of them exploiting rather than accidentally doing it. I'm not ok with just issuing bans for everyone without looking into if was a one time thing or they know and are legitimately exploiting. unless its something extremely complicated to do that would almost never happen in regular circumstances.

[Aenigmatista]

So you're telling me that you wouldn't be pissed if you got banned for accidentally doing a glitch cause I gotta say I would. During the invisible glitch if I actually had default skins on any of my characters would of accidentally done it several times as I didn't even know what was required to do it while it was still live. And publishing a psa that outlines how to do the glitch in an effort to curb it would just make matters worse. Now I could see them setting up a system that tracks reports over a time period for it so multiple reports in a timeframe with evidence could lead to a ban. I'd be ok with that as there's documented proof of them exploiting rather than accidentally doing it. I'm not ok with just issuing bans for everyone without looking into if was a one time thing or they know and are legitimately exploiting. unless its something extremely complicated to do that would almost never happen in regular circumstances.

I have never glitched by accident. I've played over 2000 matches. I think it's a ******** argument as I've never encountered a glitcher that did it by accident and didn't make use of his clear advantage.

[Luckydevil_010]

I have never glitched by accident. I've played over 2000 matches. I think it's a ******** argument as I've never encountered a glitcher that did it by accident and didn't make use of his clear advantage.

Love that argument I've never done it so nobody has ever done it. As I stated the only thing that prevented me from accidentally doing the invisible glitch is the fact that I don't use the default skins on my ops so yes I would've been extremely mad if I had received a ban for doing a glitch that I wasn't even aware of. I'm trying to work with ya here to see if we can find a compromise hence the reason in my first post I asked if there's a precedent for banning glitchers as I've never actually heard of one. Would you agree that the system in my last post could work or need improvements.

[RunnerRunner22]

I have never triggered a glitch by accident. I see how it could happen with the invisibility glitch, but not the shield-no-ads glitch. What a coincidence that it always happens to those poor Blitz players...

Also, you can end the glitch by letting your operator go through any kind of animation. So UBI could inform how to stop the glitch in case it triggered by accident and ban anyone who still uses it.

In any case Ubi should ban a player who uses a glitch more than once per match. The chance that somebody accidently triggers a glitch multiple times is very close to zero. This would be the absolute minimum but not enough. The glitchers would adapt and take turns just like those effing TKers do.

I don’t understand you asking for precedence. What does it matter?

[Luckydevil_010]

I have never triggered a glitch by accident. I see how it could happen with the invisibility glitch, but not the shield-no-ads glitch. What a coincidence that it always happens to those poor Blitz players...

Also, you can end the glitch by letting your operator go through any kind of animation. So UBI could inform how to stop the glitch in case it triggered by accident and ban anyone who still uses it.

In any case Ubi should ban a player who uses a glitch more than once per match. The chance that somebody accidently triggers a glitch multiple times is very close to zero. This would be the absolute minimum but not enough. The glitchers would adapt and take turns just like those effing TKers do.

I don’t understand you asking for precedence. What does it matter?

I was curious if there was a precedent and if there was was it something simple to implement.