1. #1
    Gulzt's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    100

    Ninja statistics

    A loooong time ago, RoguishRonin posted the following:
    https://forums.ubi.com/showthread.ph...1#post10792265

    The topic explains how the team is working with a statistician to find a good measure for ninja difficulty. I would so love to see an extended list where a ton more tracks are factored in. Is there any chance you would produce such a graph? The tools are there as you've shown. It would be amazing as a giant to-do list

    Share this post

  2. #2
    This late in the games lifetime I not sure if it would really be worth anyone's time to do. The rating system gathered quite a lot of hate from the ninja community also, although i did kinda like it myself despite there being some pretty obvious issues (hallowvale's rating etc.).
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Are these levels serious ?
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by Chaaampy Go to original post
    Are these levels serious ?
    Serious in the sense that they were trying to create a new ninja level system based on an algorithm as opposed to someone just choosing a level for each track, so don't expect the number to represent the levels we currently use today. That being said its pretty clear that it didnt really work since some of those tracks are horrifically misplaced. It was a cool idea to try to remove subjectivity from track ratings, but would be incredibly hard to get right i would imagine.
    Share this post

  5. #5
    Hmm yeah sure, because seeing tracks like Hallowvale or Sedonia there ...
    Share this post

  6. #6
    Gulzt's Avatar Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    100
    Yes. I'm still curious what it would look like if a ton more tracks were considered. I could filter out the Ninja 1 tracks in that graph (using lists from StormPsychoz and track-central etc.) and then play them in the order of statistical difficulty
    Share this post