I have a question: I bought the DLC,but after I see some spoilers and start playing, I found little motivation to go to the end, something on this DLC have Lore relevance ? this looks too self contained with no room for tought,I really love the afterlife but as a longtime fan of the series the thing looks with no better terms, too useless . more people dislike this ?
I know people will complain with acusation of being cut content from the main game if the thing have more substance but why do the thing on the first place if will worth nothing ?
I disagree. I think this game is awesome. It is the best game that I have ever played in my life. The graphics are amazing, and the violence against the Romans is understandable.
Everytime I ride by a Roman, I just want to slash and kill them with a "get out of here" attitude.
It's like the Nazi's versus the Allies to me. Then, this new DLC, with its afterlife lore, and the "Field Of Reeds", plus Aaru, and the rest, makes me see that Ubisoft really did its homework.
I've brought some of the earlier games in this series but, it is nowhere as great to me as ACO. This is why I wholeheartedly disagree.
I think the hole afterlife idea is a bit stupid for Assassin's Creed I mean really... Zombies? why does every game nowadays need living dead people ugh to be honest I think Ubisoft doesn't care much about the lore and Origins storyline pretty much proves that and if I'm wrong it probably has to do with the marketing department and higher ups because zombies equals money. Giant scorpions I mean come on... Next we are gonna shoot lightning cause Layla hacks the Animus.
oooh my what a twist...Originally Posted by Insectodium Go to original post