Let me guess, no fixes on old weapons in the next update | Forums

[ctbearfxt]

At least patch notes don't have it except those few FG weapons which I'm pretty sure will still be glitched (reloading animation).

[UbiInsulin]

Which weapon issues are you interested in the status of, specifically?

[ctbearfxt]

If you have read other posts regard about weapon bugs you would know them clearly. MK17 magazine (20 rounds mag becomes 30, and 30 rounds mag becomes 20), SASG 12 model proportion, L85 bolt/ACOG position, P227 hammer, M4 stock proportion, AUG wrong magazines size, MAC 10 and Skorpion have oppisite magazine size, all fallen ghost weapons had wrong reloading animation when they were added to campaign (Not to mention R4's bolt never moves when firing) These are just things that I can come up with, there are other things may not be bugs but don't make sense at all such as M4/PSG doesn't have stock mods, R5 doesn't have selector fire, LMGs can't be mounted with larger scopes, marksman rifles can't be used with smaller sights, spare ammo counts are very unbalanced (if you use M14 or Sasg 12 with drum mag you will know what I'm taking about)...................

[Klaymond]

Which weapon issues are you interested in the status of, specifically?

.............bruh...

[GiveMeTactical]

BRUH!!!!

[Kane_sg]

Well the CMs obviously do not remember every single thing and that's understandable. The dev, however, are the ones that need to be questioned.

And don't forget about the PDR and MDR shown wrong in the mod screen for the Main Campaign.

[ctbearfxt]

LOL just like I thought, none of these issues were fixed, beside MDR all other FG weapons have glitched realoding animation. (R4 and PSG 1 use left hand, PDR has extremely fast reloading)
Nicely done Ubisoft, and not to mention the rest FG weapons are locked behind paywall, it's just great, even as the most negligible part of the update, you guys can't even get it right. Guess I will just stay away from this garbage and back to ARMA 3.

It's fine by me if a dev team choose not to take suggestions from the community, but I have never seen anyone who choose to ignore reported bugs consistently, then they are simply not worth players' supporting at all.

[msssaf]

It's fine by me if a dev team choose not to take suggestions from the community, but I have never seen anyone who choose to ignore reported bugs consistently, then they are simply not worth players' supporting at all.

I have to say I'm totally agree with you. This game is not worth the name of "Ghost Recon" because of the attitude they dealing with weapons.

[GiveMeTactical]

Well, all of you are wrong because according to those in the know, WL is a much better GR than even the original was... imagined that!

Also, not to poke a bear in the bollocks but, if you guys thought once you give UBI your money they would listen to you... welcome to the real world. ON the other hand, aside from them fixing the bugs/glitches that never were fixed, I was not expecting any more content than what we already have and I keep wondering why you guys thought UBI was going to bring more.

It is time to think with your wallet people... those of you getting upset.

[ctbearfxt]

The best Ghost Recon is the first one with Hero Unleashed mod