🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #11
    See, this is why I dont take games too seriously.

    Memes dont bother me. I love memes, but I also have a sense of humor and enjoy smiling and laughing.

    I dont really agree with someone quitting over the memes that the game offers, since they are actually very minor in comparison to the amount of actual medieval content.

    All I know is, Im still loving For Honor after all this time, and I was in closed and open beta. So ive been here from almost the very beginning.

    And the fact you had to put in your little hate for Conq... kinda ruins your entire post for me. You dont seem to know how to play. If you're having trouble with Conq, that's a personal problem. I dont have problems with conq... well unless im playing Centurion....
    Share this post

  2. #12
    Originally Posted by EvoXTalhante Go to original post
    This mass leaving of players is kinda worrying...

    Take care.
    nothing compared to the 1st week of For Honor's release.
    If the amount of people that left all made threads then this forum would have exploded already, spam bots would look like nothing compared to that
    Share this post

  3. #13
    SpaceJim12's Avatar Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,218
    but it is not a MASSIVE game like pubg etc. never will be. too difficult
    No difficult at all. Take Shaman, spam feint and light. Take Bers for male gender. Profit.
    There are a lot reasons of For Honor not messive. And on the top is game getting worst in each season. And after year we have no new content, stupidly unbalanced chars and no real medival atmoshere fights at all.
    Share this post

  4. #14
    Originally Posted by Sauronbaine Go to original post
    See, this is why I dont take games too seriously.

    Memes dont bother me. I love memes, but I also have a sense of humor and enjoy smiling and laughing.

    I dont really agree with someone quitting over the memes that the game offers, since they are actually very minor in comparison to the amount of actual medieval content.

    All I know is, Im still loving For Honor after all this time, and I was in closed and open beta. So ive been here from almost the very beginning.

    And the fact you had to put in your little hate for Conq... kinda ruins your entire post for me. You dont seem to know how to play. If you're having trouble with Conq, that's a personal problem. I dont have problems with conq... well unless im playing Centurion....
    He’s bad because he mentions conquerors recovery time? Right, then.

    I’m a conqueror main, and I think his recovery time after a missed bash is a bit absurd. You’re being a bit too defensive.
    Share this post

  5. #15
    Originally Posted by brashtralas Go to original post
    He’s bad because he mentions conquerors recovery time? Right, then.

    I’m a conqueror main, and I think his recovery time after a missed bash is a bit absurd. You’re being a bit too defensive.
    Just look at his post history. It really says a lot about his defensiveness. He's consistently one of the most defensive conq players on the forums.

    I play conq pretty often but rather have a well balanced game than consistently defend a character or mechanic just because I play him/her.

    If you are going to say "if you have a problem with x, Then it's a pe4sonal problem" - at least give some constructive advice.
    Share this post

  6. #16
    Originally Posted by brashtralas Go to original post
    He’s bad because he mentions conquerors recovery time? Right, then.

    I’m a conqueror main, and I think his recovery time after a missed bash is a bit absurd. You’re being a bit too defensive.
    They increased recovery times on 2 out of the 3 shield bashes in season 1 and it completely killed Conqueror for most of year 1 and you're complaining because we don't want a repeat of that same exact change?
    Share this post

  7. #17
    Once again, we have to tell you. ALOT of characters can actually completely 100% counter the shield bash((Not uppercut)) on a dodge.

    Alot of characters have good dodge recovery times that they can GB a missed shield bash.

    If you have a dodge attack, its also a free hit.

    I agree that shield bash on characters that CAN'T counter it like centurion.... is kinda broken but unfortunatly, you can't just nerf Shield bash and make everything ok again, cause then he'll suck even worse against the charaacters that already can counter him.


    And the devs wanted each character to have different recoverys on dodges, attacks etc.
    Share this post

  8. #18
    I understand and accept your feelings.
    But I don't think it's very healthy to assume that the devs are only thinking about competitive players.
    Because if they only cared about them heros like mushu wouldn't be designed. and kensei would be a lot harder to deal with.

    I truly believe the devs are trying to raise the skill floor but keeping things relatively reactable.
    I really think the only hero that might have crossed that line was berzerkers rework.
    if we didn't think about conq's forward bash mess everything else they did with him is 100% fine.
    and it's not hard to really make his bash less oppressive.

    I just am torn on zerk because I don't think the unblockables alone would have been enough for her. But I do think having 4ooms armored lights is just too far.
    see you around. hopefully you come back someday.
     1 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  9. #19
    Originally Posted by Knight_Raime Go to original post
    I understand and accept your feelings.
    But I don't think it's very healthy to assume that the devs are only thinking about competitive players.
    Because if they only cared about them heros like mushu wouldn't be designed. and kensei would be a lot harder to deal with.

    I truly believe the devs are trying to raise the skill floor but keeping things relatively reactable.
    I really think the only hero that might have crossed that line was berzerkers rework.
    if we didn't think about conq's forward bash mess everything else they did with him is 100% fine.
    and it's not hard to really make his bash less oppressive.

    I just am torn on zerk because I don't think the unblockables alone would have been enough for her. But I do think having 4ooms armored lights is just too far.
    see you around. hopefully you come back someday.
    400ms on armor...

    Whiff attacks and immediately cancel with dodge or zone.

    parry heavy and go for zone that does 30dmg into a mix up.

    Those are my issues with zerker.
    Share this post

  10. #20
    Originally Posted by RenegadeTX2000 Go to original post
    400ms on armor...

    Whiff attacks and immediately cancel with dodge or zone.

    parry heavy and go for zone that does 30dmg into a mix up.

    Those are my issues with zerker.
    I mean whiff into either dodge attack or zone is risky as fudge for the zerk. as the dodge would equal a light parry punish. and i'm pretty sure some parts of zerks zone count as a light parry punish. Even then the zone is still a stamina intensive investment either way.

    Parry heavy into zone is strong yes. But not insanely. as other heros have nearly the same damage punish on heavy parries with usually less stamina cost. So. annoying? sure. oppressive? I personally don't think so.
    Share this post