I understand that this is the best game ever made and you can't accept anyone that says otherwise.Originally Posted by Charmzzz Go to original post
When the game loses every player because they are tired of cheap tactics,then I bet you will still defend it like you always do.
You can CLEARLY see Highlander try to light attack at least twice which didn't work because of how slow he is.Let me guess,you think Warden's SB mixup is "REACTABLE and you just suck if you can't" right? Is that why even the top players of the community have called it a 50/50?
The reps spoke up on it because of pretty much the example in this thread, rather than debate an argument, people were saying your view is worthless because of your stats.Originally Posted by Devils-_-legacy Go to original post
Countered, avoided, the point still persist.Originally Posted by BarbeQMichael Go to original post
2 buttons "combo" that is a:
-Push
-UB
-safe
- Leads to free damage
- Spammable, with low stamina cost.
It goes against every rule of a fightinh game, ever. But i know FH is just a random game, not thought at all to be competitive, or taken seriously.
Now you start bullsh*tting because my argument is better than you saying "impossibruuu!"? Warden's SB after hitting a Light is reactable if you are not face-to-face with him. Warden's SB from neutral is super easily reactable and punishable. Again, if you cannot do it that is your thing. I cannot do it all the time, too. But I know that it is possible and I can do it if I concentrate.Originally Posted by WastedPunk Go to original post
Do you play other Fighter games? I did ages ago, and I can remember that EVERY SINGLE ONE had your so-called "cheap tactics". And every "cheap tactic" was counterable in some way.
You let Warden come in close, that is your first mistake. Then, if Warden dodges from neutral to initiate his SB: 700ms - your light in def is 600ms. If he dodges from neutral you can just throw out a side light. It will interrupt his SB attempt 100%. And dont "counter" that with "he could parry" because that is true for every attack...Originally Posted by Specialkha Go to original post
Just saying, if I had a dollar for everytime you shared your FHT profile and said who you played against, i'd be a millionaireOriginally Posted by Charmzzz Go to original post
"I understand that this is the best game ever made and you can't accept anyone that says otherwise"Originally Posted by WastedPunk Go to original post
Strawman. And charmzz has their own issues with the game.
"when the game loses every player because they are tired of cheap tactics then I bet you will still defend it like you always do."
Strawman. And unless you've been around as long as charmzz has you can't factually state that they defend everything done with the game.
Lack of evidence does not equal evidence empirically.
"guess you think warden's sb mix up is reactable and you just suck if you can't right? is that why even the top players have called it a 50/50?"
Strawman. Wardens mix up is reactable if he doesn't have hitstun on you from a confirmed hit. and at that point you can still just roll away. As you can any other mix up in the game.
the term 50/50 is abused in this game and hasn't been used by top players in a long time because of how split the community is on the term.
50/50 in other fighting games means your opponent does something. which they can do 1 of 2 things from. there are no tells that hint at what your opponent will do. forcing you to guess. and if you guess wrong you eat damage. Since rolling away negates any choice a player would have to make in for honor there are no traditional 50/50's. Also. Top players have said a lot of things. Those don't stay true forever because opinions change. If you were really that tapped into what the top tier players were saying you'd know that warden has been considered trash for a long time now and that SB is basically useless outside of a crushing counter since that confirms one.