Because Ubi has already said, multiple times, an open weapons system would be extremely hard to balance and that the Team has tested 6v6s and 8v8s and they didnt like what how the game felt. In the end, the answer is. just. no. Some people are having a hard time accepting this.Originally Posted by wildbill3369 Go to original post
The game isn't made to be enjoyable on such game mode , just join us with the idea of "Expert mod" ( that remove drones and casual features such as , thermal , marking , endless revives and more .. ) and the increased capacity of rooms , 6v6 to 8v8 , so we can get a chance to enjoy the game by playing solo , the unbalancement is actually a cancer in this game , players jump on ranked and they don't give a sh.. about teamplay
If there is no fast fixes it will be hard to save the game .
Well you have helped the forums a lot more there. Well done. Condescending enough for you?Originally Posted by GodhandR Go to original post
I do not come on and speak for everyone I know that. I can only speak for the players I know and talk to along with the players who post on these forums and am therefore acting as a voice for these people who do not post on here as well as the ones who do and missed the thread.
I get sick to death of the far lefty snowflake liberalism that is worming into society and gaming who get butt hurt when their rhetoric is challanged. When someone makes a comment about pretty much "all the community" they are giving flase information. I can debate all day based around a long experience of GR and the players I've played with and still play with. And I'm not isolating player base as I and many have suggested more modes help everyone. And remember GR has been going a long time and it has had a huge following with a devote fan base, these fans are allowed a voice you know.
I have never known so many complaints with a game as this one. Nerf this Nerf that all created by classes and perks. Have a mode with no drones or tech and the people who want to play it will. Bet there is less moaning
I fail to see how having 6v6 or 8v8 would make the game any better. All I imagine is that there will be vastly more drawn rounds as players revive each other left right and centre. Nobody would dare move out of cover as there will be eyes everywhere. Why does 4v4 suck so much for you that they need to change the game? I'm not being inflammatory, I genuinely want to know why people think it would improve the game. Would your car me so much better with 8 wheels?
“13 year old kids, liberlaism, snow flakes.” You a just a moron. What place does any of that bull**** have in the forums. Hence, you’re a condescending *****. I honestly don’t care that the series has “been around awhile” never played a single one of them due to being deployed. GW is GW, some of the old guard need to get that through their heads. If the only response you have to someone is to tuck in an insult, just don’t. Real easy to be a smart alec with a keyboard.Originally Posted by ROWEMEISTER Go to original post
Originally Posted by Strep72 Go to original post
The class balance would really get thrown out of whack too. Pred, point, Tank, Tech, Scout, Medic. 8v8, add the Pathfinder, Assasssin, Sniper, or Sentinel. The game would get so quick and really show an upper-hand on some maps. The intent and abilities really limits how much you can put in the game before it really messes with the overall flow.
Honestly Ubi has already split the community, the community is splitting itself, and the online numbers is dwindling down for the following reasons:
-Ubi been very silent on the PvP since the beginning(from E3 GRW reveal, Ghost War reveal, till 6 months later)
-this made to PvE players toxic to PvP players of what they said every day in the forums
Examples:
-GRW was never meant to have PvP
-Go play Cod, BF, etc..
-We don’t want PvP to be the main focus to have PvE content die
Now the content is causing the players to dwindle down
-no full Gunsmith due to balance(the adding cosmetics and no stat change is the #1 toxic community discussion between players )
-the classes didn’t have almost more than 2 guns
-we heard of 8v8 / 6v6 test but no beta for the players to test
-no TDM with respawn(it would be good to add this later)
-classes seem OP to others such as the predator(more specific the battle rage)
The term of balance is to turn off the auto-aim assist to actually have the players learn to use they guns and up what stats they want to increase or sacrifice a particular stat to increase such as handling, accuracy, etc.. That’s balanced.
Lastly is the in-game communication:
-The Bravo and Alpha has no communication to talk amongst each other in the lobby.(This split the player base)
-Yes there may be toxic players to talk trash. Plenty solutions players are given such as the mute/block button
-Most players actually give good feedback more than negative when I see they which from a bravo to alpha team on the next match
-Some new and old players don’t understand the true reason why we want more modes/player count
Examples:
-when people say they want a TDM mode with respawn they not saying go COD. GR has always had TDM in GR style
- No we don’t want to take this from the Elimination, Uplink, new hostage modes, or any current plan modes
-This is why custom lobbies is important to have fun
- Most of us prefer a TDM with respawn that has an objective and no just purely kills. The ones that recommend Cod doesn’t understand this
Every player should have the right to speak for him/herself and not just recommend to go play another game. You say there is plenty of other games that has what we looking for.
Is it title GR? No
Is it third person? No
Is it a third person tactical shooter? No
Is it a shooter where you can’t jump and shoot in the air? No
Is it just mostly gun to gun action without things flying out the air and having sci-fi weapons? No
I can go on but Cod can never be like GR as well as GR will never be call of duty. I truly hope the next GR gives more communication and content to its players as it did in its glory days. The PvP discussion is already starting on FarCry 5 which may get the toxic like GRW. It’s a Ubi thing is now. I would say GRW is my third favorite game in the franchise. It’s predecessors killed it hands down which is why they don’t want to make none of the games “BACKWARDS COMPATIABLE”. I guarantee if Ubi made GRFS or GRAW2 compatible for Xbox one the same toxic players will wish we come back.
The 6v6 / 8v8 is defined to have more playing time with your friends. It's not needed to say hey we want to kill more people. If you don't have many people on your friend list this is the perfect game for you. However when you have 5+ guys show up in your party chat sending you a ton of invites the 4v4 restricts the playing together. You have to turn some people down and eventually may have a player remove you off they list. So its all about playing together. Yes! you can do a custom match but some people don't want custom because no ranking or just don't want to play against someone they ask to join as a cooperative play. I don't understand how an open world game has such a small player count than a indoor 5v5 game like RB6 Siege.Originally Posted by Strep72 Go to original post
Never mentioned 13 year olds! They must be on your mind...Originally Posted by GodhandR Go to original post
"Real easy to be a smart alec with a keyboard" yep you're one too then!