Larger Upgrade Pack(s) | Forums

[Geerti95]

A cash spender will always have an edge over non spenders no matter how you swing it

NOPE

Unless you are a wallet whale.

The events actually give some pretty nice rewards.
Same for the pvp packs.

If you play smart you get some really good materials.

The 45 cost of pvp pack is totally irrelevant to this.
It's the best way to spend money.
But it takes actual work .. you have to win those matches.
The point of spending is mostly because you lack time...
I honnestly think the pvp pack is great... good rewards in return for time.
There should be a small difference in the pvp pack rewards you get to encourage going up.
Otherwise everyone would stay at level 1
This is only fair.
Also for the free players this needs to be like that.
They added the 45 cash function for pay players.
In return for time you can get a great pack.


The difference in pvp packs is not that big 1
You can pretty quickly climb the ranks if you play smart 2
The cost is really really low 3
If you want materials this is not the best choise 4

If you need cards this is pretty great.
It's a lot like the lockers wich can give some great payout aswell.

These expensive packs aren't even that great.
Compared to some event packs it is fairly well balanced.

You don't understand the balance there is right now.

Packs should cost a certain amount .. not to cheap so that spenders become super overpowered... not to expensive so it becommes completely useless...
In order to be really good on this game you are going to need to spend a good amount and I think that's fine
This balances pay to win with free to play.

My teammate spend a small amount and got close to my level but she plays a lot and plays well.
I am free to play yet I am still higher level.

This means there is a good balance.

[Ibetough]

A cash spender will always have an edge over non spenders no matter how you swing it

NOPE

And this is where I stop trying to engage reasonable debate with you. I don't know what advantage you think you have right now that you feel you need to desperately defend, but your attempts to argue against my points are just embarrassing, really.

[Ibetough]

Have you noticed the difference between you and me? Everything I've suggested has been an idea to strengthen the economical success of the game so it can continue to grow and shine, whereas everything you are suggesting or opposing is in relation to real money advantage.

I suspect therefore that you are a free player who puts a lot of time and thought into the game to maximise efficiency, and the thought of cash spenders pulling ahead of you even faster, clearly terrifies you.