🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Assassin's Creed forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #181
    People act like you're a narrow minded idiot when you complain about this, like there is something wrong with your eyes...glad there are more people joining the protest...I started thinking it might seriously just be my console. The more people complain about this the more likely it is to be fixed....well that's what I'm hoping for. I haven't even touched the game in three weeks now....just disappointing!
    Share this post

  2. #182
    Mee too, maybe a lot of people just came un yo the Game when 1.03 was released, so they dont experiencie the Game like us, i dont know its the only explanation i found because the downgrade is obvious, the images from ri0t are the best prove... The ****ing mapa doesnt charge properly!!!!!! WTF its hillarious, and ubisoft must do something, tell something or face the consequences
    Share this post

  3. #183
    I reverted to 1.0 (deleted game from ps4 storage, left saves) - is it me or the problems were even worse before release(i was playing on my pre-rollback save)? Don't try it. It seems that Day One patch was big graphics and they took it back to pre-release state....
    Share this post

  4. #184
    I still believe it is a downgrade and a big one. After seeing Ri0t23 his screenshots comparisation. And it's not like they didn't do it before. Remember Watchdog? Renember The Division? All downgraded.
    Share this post

  5. #185
    But hey let them dig their own grave.... lol
    Share this post

  6. #186
    Originally Posted by Redw0lfAlpha Go to original post
    I still believe it is a downgrade and a big one. After seeing Ri0t23 his screenshots comparisation. And it's not like they didn't do it before. Remember Watchdog? Renember The Division? All downgraded.
    Yeah, but not after the game launched... still 1.0 is still much different from Day One patch...
    Share this post

  7. #187
    Because everybody here, even the user who posted the comparison video (thank you btw, it is clear now that all this bug thing is a bull s h i t) made a huge information error. The game released with day one patch and it was on version 1.02. Reverting to no patch, which means 1.0 will only make it even worse than it is now. So there is no hope except for Ubisoft to repair this game. If they care that is. They will launch DLC and that educational mode and they expect people to still buy it? This is Mass Effect Andromeda all over again. In the end we are stuck with a less s h i ty version of a game and have to deal with it. They have our money. WTF? Take EA's example. After the hate they received, they dropped micro transactions in Battlefront 2 completely. Maybe a Reddit with YouTube videos and 500k down-votes on their pages like FB, YouTube, and so on will make them reconsider messing with us again. Also, I won't spend another dollar on their **** products. Damn you Ubisoft! Damn you!
    Share this post

  8. #188
    I truly worry about some of you, banging on about downgrades. You understand that most games get downgrades because when they first appear at events like E3 the devs go beyond the point of ambitious and show off an early version of a game running on a super high spec PC. They mainly do this to build up hype or perhaps with the hope they can retain the look and feel of it. But development of games isn't as easy as some of you seem to believe. I guess both sides are to blame - including us - because we have this picture in our heads of what has to be delivered. Origins has not been downgraded. There is nothing to downgrade. It's not Watchdog or Division which was released looking completely different from the original showcase. Grow up.

    How many times do they have to state they've acknowledged it's a problem that shouldn't be present. So much petulant feet stamping around here. The chaps that have posted screengrabs and videos - well done. There is no doubt the game needs a specific patch and the community responding and sharing has already helped them understand a fix is required. The rest of you crying about how they don't care and wanting to refund their copy - go on then, go and refund it.
    Share this post

  9. #189
    Originally Posted by spookythespur Go to original post
    I truly worry about some of you, banging on about downgrades. You understand that most games get downgrades because when they first appear at events like E3 the devs go beyond the point of ambitious and show off an early version of a game running on a super high spec PC. They mainly do this to build up hype or perhaps with the hope they can retain the look and feel of it. But development of games isn't as easy as some of you seem to believe. I guess both sides are to blame - including us - because we have this picture in our heads of what has to be delivered. Origins has not been downgraded. There is nothing to downgrade. It's not Watchdog or Division which was released looking completely different from the original showcase. Grow up.

    How many times do they have to state they've acknowledged it's a problem that shouldn't be present. So much petulant feet stamping around here. The chaps that have posted screengrabs and videos - well done. There is no doubt the game needs a specific patch and the community responding and sharing has already helped them understand a fix is required. The rest of you crying about how they don't care and wanting to refund their copy - go on then, go and refund it.
    Buddy, you understand that people are not talking about a downgrade of the game from the E3 build, they're talking about a downgrade from previous patches (1.02) where the game looked really good, but then they decided to "Fix" something in the recent patches but in reality they just made the game uglier.
    Share this post

  10. #190
    Originally Posted by patrickb1973 Go to original post
    Exactly, well said.
    Very well said indeed.
    Share this post