Junior Member
As I just pointed out: This thread is for suggestions only. If you like to ask questions do that by starting your own please.Originally Posted by KingSpawn1979 Go to original post
If there is any chance of getting suggestions to a productive state keep it short and on point.
I knowingly included already made suggestions for that very reason.
Company guidelines normally require every community manager to create vague answers and never make promises because they
1. have no say over that decisions anyway and
2. Part of their job is to avoid creating any kind of angle for legal liabilities. Expecting definitive answers other than official news was and always will be pointless/futile.
tl:dr
only suggestions please.
Senior Member
With all Respect, and no Offense, we had Tons of Threads like this since Beta.
And although it is of course your Right to start another one the only Question that matters is:
Will they change/do anything in PvE?
As long as this is not answered all that Suggestions are worthless.
Banned
It is pointless they don't listen to us. Look at the new weekly challenge for proof. We are just cash piniatas to them. I for one am done asking for/suggesting anything because they don't care. The mods just smile and nod at us like I do to my 84 year old mother when she starts talking nonsense.
*Fake Enthusiasm* "That's a great idea, mom. I'll surely tell city hall that they have to cage all the runaway squirrels." *Idiotic smile and nod*
*Fake Enthusiasm* "What a great idea, I will let the dev team know you are tired of Tier Boosters as a weekly challenge reward/any other suggestion made." *Idiotic smile and nod*
Anyone see a difference? Personally I don't.
BTW, I love my mother very much but she is going senile.
Junior Member
To continue to argue after I explicitly asked you not to is the exact opposite of respect. Especially if you think it's pointless anyway.Originally Posted by KingSpawn1979 Go to original post
This thread is for suggestions only.
Banned
He is just providing a valid point, dude. And to keep with your theme: I SUGGEST we listen to KingSpawn because he asks a valid question and brings up a valid point. Why bother when it has all been done before? Do you think you are going to be the saviour of GRW PVE? Because I thought that once with well brought up and intelligently thought out complaint/wishlists that got as far as this will go. So good luck to you GRW PVE Saviour number 1134565, we are all rooting for you, we really are.Originally Posted by TyrDaishi Go to original post
And why can't we suggest cosmetic fixes just because YOU don't care about them? What if the rest of us do? Or do we not really matter? All the stuff in your list has been brought up many times too.
And what does blufor mean anway?
Senior Member
I'm sure you do, but unfortunately it's becoming quite obvious this is the last time we hear of these requests until someone points them out again in few weeks. It has been so ever since beta and at this rate will remain so for foreseeable future.Originally Posted by UbiMarsuves Go to original post
Kudos for OP for great suggestions, it's a real shame that these things that have been brought up ever since beta get the exact same response. "Thanks for the suggestions, we will pass them to devs" from the mods and the occasional "it's not the devs vision for this game, read the Q&A bible!" from certain users.
My wishlist for updates remains the same, three things that use existing assets already in game and would not take any resources to implement.. Everything else, like the things listed by OP would be more than welcome as well, but I consider them a bonus.
-New game plus
Ability to reset story missions and to play through the story again with your maxed out ghost in correct order
-Unequip primary weapons and/or backpack
Possibility to go in with just a pistol and pick up your primary weapons from enemies you kill. Possibility to have just one primary. Possibility to have no backpack and one or both primary weapons. Possibility to choose your own equipment like a true elite soldier.
-Customize AI team member outfits and loadouts
Possibility to have your team look like elite soldiers and not some Metallica music video extras. Possibility to choose your teams equipment like a true elite soldier unit team leader.
Senior Member
In a nutshell, BLUFOR is an acronym for blue forces which represent friendly forces. OPFOR = opposing forces.Originally Posted by Vargus17 Go to original post
Senior Member
The 30rnd AUG magazines in the game is actually a 42 round mag, Ubi should have added the 30rnd mag and made that one a 42 round mag.
The 10rnd Saiga-12 magazine is actually an 8 round magazine in real life, and 30 round magazine appears to actually be a 10 round magazine. The 5 round saiga 12 mag looks a little short as well. (I do agree seems the saiga 12 is scaled up a little too much)
The 50rnd Pmag is actually the PMAG 40 and should only have 40 rounds, and not 50 rounds (this isn't The Division). Ubi could use the Magpul PMAG D60 with 60 rounds to replace the 50 round mag, it's already in the game on one of the special rifles the El Commandante....
The 50 round steel mag used with the M4A1 and other rifles is the Surefire MAG5-60 that is a 60rnd magazine.
The MP7 30 round mag is in actuality a 40 round mag, a 30 round mag exists so not sure why that wasn't added or why the 40 round mag isn't a 40 round mag.
The first of the two muzzle breaks UBi calls "Compensators" it has the ports in the wrong directions should be to the 3-9 o'clock of the barrel not the 6-12 o'clock as that would impair ones sight picture in low light environments (even more so than a muzzle break would normally) hence why that muzzle device is designed to be used in conjunction with a suppressor, it would also ruin the functionality of the break as well as kick up a metric f*%kton of dust, sand, dirt, or debris when crouching or prone.
The Magpul UBR it's not used properly in the game as the entire point of the UBR is to maintain the same cheek weld on the stock even when the stock is extended passed its collapsed state. https://www.magpul.com/products/ubr-collapsible-stock
The fake reticle on the "Digital Scope" is useless and should have been the correct reticle that is meant to be on the ELCAN Specter DR that the scope is meant to actually be. https://1shotgear.com/sites/default/...?itok=A5A_IYEo anything with holdovers would be better what is in the game already on the Specter DR.
The field of view on the scopes/optics function in an incorrect manner as the field of view increases when going up in magnification opposed to decreasing as they should be.
Surbu Super Shorty shotgun should have one round in the chamber so it would have 3 shotshells instead of 2.
The ACOG and "Digital Scope" are mounted too far forward on a number of guns (Example: ACOG on the MK17) as they have a very limited eye relief meaning one's eye needs to be a certain distance from the lens of the optic to function properly so the optics can't be mounted too far forward otherwise they are essentially useless.
Side mounted optics rail for the AK47 should not be attached when only using iron sights there is no reason to carry the extra weight of an optics rail that isn't being used.
The placement of vertical/angled grips are either too far forward or laughably too far back to the point they would not add any functionality or impede one from reloading at all like with the Saiga 12.
Senior Member
Senior Member
One that really ticks me is the open dust covers on that one sniper scope. When you holster the weapon the dust covers should be in a closed position.Originally Posted by FerroMortem Go to original post
