Am I the only one that leaves.. | Forums

[ChampionRuby50g]

Waste of your time, its demeaning, its embarrassing if there were witnesses, I mean if you really think these two things are the same then just do a quick survey with your real life friends. Ask them which one they think is worse or if they are analogous, I'd be blown away if half of them think they are comparable. Those other examples aren't at all the same, for some of the reasons I gave already. Some of the examples you gave im sure you would remember for months maybe even years afterwards, are you going to remember some random roach get the final blow on a guy days from now?

I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Do you really think that the person knocking the coffee would care if it's embarrassing if they just went out of their way to inconvenience you, eg: stealing your kill.
And it's not wasting their own time if they are taking other people's hard work. Only demeaning.

If it's a one of case, no I wouldn't remember it. But In a small community, when you see the same players doing the same thing over and over again with malicious intent, of course you will start to remember them.

[ChampionRuby50g]

Honestly for me it kind of depends on the situation as I have characters that fit all the different classes. If I am an assassin and it happens then yeah I am annoyed, you just screwed up my renown gain, I am even more annoyed if it wasn't another assassin because in terms of renown, we, as a team, are at a net loss. If I am not an assassin, then eh it goes on my scoreboard,if it was an assassin that did it, I very much get it and I will, when I am an assassin, do the same though not to another assassin when we are not in a zone.

I will also jump in without question and get why my team mates would if we are fighting in a zone, a white zone does us no good at all and I am playing the objective. Not if my ally just got a wall splat but if you are dancing around doing nothing like it is a duel, that is on you, some matches have fine margins and while I won't be all Sorry! Thanks! even if my team mate is all Wow! Wow! Wow! I'm not going to consider my team mate's feelings in that situation either.

Very much agreed on your first paragraph. When I have full health as my PK and I have a player join in, it's infuriating because it's now harder to press the advantage. On Vanguard or Hybrid, I'm only ever annoyed when it's obvious kill stealing.

On a Zone it's every man for themselves. It is absolutely more important to get that secured as quick as possible. But if my team is comfortably in the lead, on a Zone or not, I will always try and avoid attacking enemy players fighting an ally who has more than 50% health, if the enemy is low.
1. Because there would be 2 enemies at full health figuring an ally somewhere
2. I don't want to frustrate my allies by kill stealing when they are doing well enough.

[bmason1000]

First off, the consequences of knocking over someone's coffee isn't something emotional, legal or monetary based. It's violence. That is the consequence.

Secondly, I am genuinely surprised this is a thing that upsets people. I had no idea. I'm with antonio on this 100%, that enemy being dead is beneficial to the team regardless of who did it, which is exactly why i do it. No one's smirking behind their screen plotting to "steal" your kills. Pure coincidence that i got the killing blow and you didn't. Or! There was a great opportunity for your teammate to kill that person much quicker, which is beneficial to your team. There is no time where your enemy being dead now instead of later is a bad thing.

If you're a person who gets upset about that, let me apologise now for all the kills the rest of us are going to help you with.

My bad, teammate. I thought you'd prefer your enemy not be alive anymore. Sorry.

[Tundra 793]

The way I'm reading this thread is; we all agree Devil sounds at least twice as annoying to play with as any kill stealer could be. Now we're just arguing the technicalities of how wrong he is?

Isn't this like you're all agreeing the sky is blue, and now you're just arguing about which shade of blue it is? Surely we can do something more productive with our time guys.

Let's try clicking those links the spam bots keeps posting!

[bmason1000]

the way i'm reading this thread is; we all agree devil sounds at least twice as annoying to play with as any kill stealer could be. Now we're just arguing the technicalities of how wrong he is?

Isn't this like you're all agreeing the sky is blue, and now you're just arguing about which shade of blue it is? Surely we can do something more productive with our time guys.

Let's try clicking those links the spam bots keeps posting!

if you think it's anything other than cyan you're a centurion main!!!...maybe perrywinkle, i guess. Not everyone sees the spectrum the same, ya know? I'm fairly reasonable, i'll allow it.

[CandleInTheDark]

The way I'm reading this thread is; we all agree Devil sounds at least twice as annoying to play with as any kill stealer could be. Now we're just arguing the technicalities of how wrong he is?

Isn't this like you're all agreeing the sky is blue, and now you're just arguing about which shade of blue it is? Surely we can do something more productive with our time guys.

Let's try clicking those links the spam bots keeps posting!

Bravo >.> Those thread titles do sometimes send me to news sites though,

if you think it's anything other than cyan you're a centurion main!!!...maybe perrywinkle, i guess. Not everyone sees the spectrum the same, ya know? I'm fairly reasonable, i'll allow it.

Also bravo

[bmason1000]

That post was a lot funnier in all caps...but i get why the forum changes it automatically haha

[ChampionRuby50g]

I'm with antonio on this 100%, that enemy being dead is beneficial to the team regardless of who did it, which is exactly why i do it. No one's smirking behind their screen plotting to "steal" your kills. Pure coincidence that i got the killing blow and you didn't. Or! There was a great opportunity for your teammate to kill that person much quicker, which is beneficial to your team. There is no time where your enemy being dead now instead of later is a bad thing.

So you mean to tell me, that my ally standing around while I take the enemy down from 100% to 10% then runs over and heavy's my opponent when I had them in a GB in which I would have killed them is perfectly fine and not plotting to steal my kill? I guess this person's controller just died then. 3 times in a row... No you're right, it's a lot quicker to let me take down all the enemies health and then my ally kills them because that won't feed the enemy revenge and I am more skilled than my allies.

[bmason1000]

So you mean to tell me, that my ally standing around while I take the enemy down from 100% to 10% then runs over and heavy's my opponent when I had them in a GB in which I would have killed them is perfectly fine and not plotting to steal my kill? I guess this person's controller just died then. 3 times in a row... No you're right, it's a lot quicker to let me take down all the enemies health and then my ally kills them because that won't feed the enemy revenge and I am more skilled than my allies.

Sometimes there's not an opportunity to attack simultaneously succesfully. A lot of times it makes sense to wait. Oherwise you're just bouncing off, feeding revenge, getting blocked, parried or just being in the way. Yes, often times sitting back until you can both land a hit IS faster and safer for both of us. It's not about "oh I'm gonna let them do all the hard work and then take it from them," it just makes more sense. If someone IS doing it maliciously or greedily...i don't know, i guess that makes them rude for not contributing when they could have? I don't know, i guess it just wouldn't bother me.