Senior Member
BigFry is usually very negative and that's why i wasnt really into listening to his rant about ghost wars.... but he stated clearly he actually thinks that GW is really good.
That's what makes his feedback on the matter credible.
And i agree with a lot of what he said.
I dont think we need best of 9 or whatever, and best of 5 instead of best of 3 would be enough.
And i DEFINITELY agree about the time between rounds. i measured 60 seconds between rounds. WTF? in a game where rounds are about 3 minutes on average spending 30% of the time in menues in horrible. time between rounds should be 20 seconds max.
Member
Senior Member
8 minutes 3/5 rounds or 4/5 minutes 11 rounds...? Your saving what 10-20 minutes depending if you play every minute and round? I am guessing that is the reason some want best of 3/5? I mean I would want a 11 round battle then a one and done type deal personally.
I would rather have the 11 rounds 4 minute each round, first to 6 wins, win! That way you get enough rounds to drench your thirst into a entire match. You have more chances of playing different play styles through a entire match, snipe, rush, point man ect. You have more playing time in learning the other teams tactics and try and counter them. That makes a multiplayer game FUN!. Not 1, 2 your done, next match? Come on man, how satisfying is that?
Objective based games with best of 11 rounds is a sweet spot.
