New Heroes, the good and bad | Forums

[DitosX]

So the New Heroes will allways have some controversy.

Honestly they do feel better than the launch of season 2, where
every nub could play centurion and smack the sh*t out of you.
Compared to season 2 the new heroes seeme counterable yet strong.
Highlander seemes abit underwhelming, but im sure soon enough good
players will learn to play him like a king. To compare, honestly the Gladiators
unblockables seeme to be counterable like regular, unlike it was with the
Centurion. Gladiator seemes like a really nasty wild card that has yet to show
its true potential.

What I dont like is that 3 out of 4 new Heroes use a lot of unblockable attacks.
I understand Raider using them, simply beacause he dosent have a lot of
combos he can utilize so easily as other Heroes. But for now I agree that
unblockable ATTACKS fit the gladiator really well (what I mean for now is that soon
some hard core player will come out of the shadows and show us how its
really played). The Unblockable shield smack still seemes a bit too much
with the leg stab (or what ever its called).


Overall, I like the balance of the new Heroes, but feel that they are trying to push
a lot of unblockalbes in with them (which may soon force a lot of players into TRY
to parry or take damage/die situations).

[Knight_Raime]

mainly to force reactions instead of passive play. it sucks from a visual point to see. but balance wise they've managed to keep the UB's with both heros pretty well balanced. So I don't have a problem with them.