Senior Member
Is this the official acronym? The hugs and kisses?Originally Posted by TheNoEffect Go to original post
Junior Member
Either that or call it the Zocks? Also, GOW4 and FFXV, even Resi 7 were explicitly referenced as games being worked on for the XOX whereas FH wasn't but was still in the montage. Every other game in there was in some way related to the briefing. FH wasnt...at least plainly. Surely for it to be used in an official promotion for the XOX it would need to be relevant? Come on Ubisoft, give us a clue...
Senior Member
Haha, didn't think of that, but it's kinda perfectOriginally Posted by Egotistic_Ez Go to original post
Senior Member
That would seem to be a logical conclusion.Originally Posted by TheNoEffect Go to original post
Senior Member
I see two explanations here:Originally Posted by TheNoEffect Go to original post
1. Ubi plans to make reedeition of FH for the new Xbox because this is great occasion for making money. Just wrap it in 'Bigger, Better' and it's gonna be sold.
2. Microsoft did that by themselves. It happened before.
Junior Member
Theres no reason for Microsoft to 'randomly' throw games in to thay montage for no reason. There was no other game thrown in in that way (noticeably no Halo 5 update even though Halo 5 was the banner for the Microsoft Briefing on the E3 website). Too much planning and rehearsal goes into every decision for E3 briefings for this to be random or a mistake. Every company knows that every facet of what you bring to E3 is going to be seen by millions and sets the tone for journalists, advertisement and ultimately project success or failure. I refuse to believe someone 'mistakenly added FH rather than Assassin's Creed. There is a reason why FH was in there and I want to know what it is.
