Asking a legit question. WHy is there never balance in pvp when designed by ubisoft? For honor is a big fail (currently there is an exploit allowing you to os ppl, that thing is out for more than 24h, and still not fixed). The division is another fail, from the customer point of view. All dlcs are trash. Underground is useless to farm, Survival is meh as it is not a part of the main game, and Last Stand could be fun if not all the OP stuff goign rampant (M4, seekers).
So again, why is there no balance when Ubisoft does something?
Ubisoft only cares about profit. We need to stop pre-ordering and only buy their games once it's finished. But gamers are not willing to wait.Originally Posted by Specialkha Go to original post
Ubisoft doesn't see how they're killing their own market. After the joke that this game is, The Division 2 will lose sales. Nobody is looking at 1.6.1 and congratulating Ubisoft on a job well done. It's broken on a level that's hard to understand. I can't program and I think I could do a better job. It'd be hard to manage a worse one.
The farce that is For Honor will lose sales in For Honor 2. The boring and repettitve Ghost Recon will lose sales for Ghost Recon 2. People will eventually get the message, it just takes time.
Why would they care about balance once they've got your money?![]()
actually i lost my hopes and will definatly not buy TD 2. I was also hyped by for honor and i am glad i was able to play the beta and was following the forums afterwards. In the beta i became clear they just wrap a piece of garbage in a shiny blingy foil with fancy stickers and glimmering effects on it but as soon you unwrap it, which takes a while you will be aware you got something like a chinese replica of something....