I don't often complain about PUG groups but come ON guys | Forums

[Antonioj26]

Christ, it's like talking with a Trump supporter about politics. "I voted for the side that happens to win, so I win and you lose!" like it's some kind of sport.

You had an opinion that Revenge should be nerfed, it was nerfed, but not because you held that opinion. You feel vindicated, but it's not because of anything you at all said or did.



Also there are people who advocated for the revenge nerf who are unhappy with the Gank-Squad Meta that we have now, so your points are moot.

Sounds like a poor sport Hilary supporter.

[TheRevanchist27]

Sounds like a poor sport Hilary supporter.

Nice try, I voted Third Party because I'm not a mindless drone. Both parties are owned by the same people.

[CoyoteXStarrk]

Nice try, I voted Third Party because I'm not a mindless drone. Both parties are owned by the same people.

I wish I could say that you being a conspiracy nut surprises me lol

[Ezcendant]

You had an opinion that Revenge should be nerfed, it was nerfed, but not because you held that opinion. You feel vindicated, but it's not because of anything you at all said or did.

Not to rain on your parade, but if revenge was nerfed for the same reason(s) that he held then, regardless of whether or not the devs even heard him, his opinion was vindicated and proven correct.

[TheRevanchist27]

I wish I could say that you being a conspiracy nut surprises me lol

It's not even a conspiracy, it's all publicly available information that key players in both parties take money from lobbying groups in Saudi Arabia, several big banks, and other lobbying firms. Photographs, disclosed financial documentation, minutes from meetings. It's all there, you just have to read it.

Now saying that the gays have poisoned the water supply to turn all the frogs gay. THAT'S a conspiracy theory, and a cooky one at that.

[Antonioj26]

Now saying that the gays have poisoned the water supply to turn all the frogs gay. THAT'S a conspiracy theory, and a cooky one at that.

I thought we finally agreed on something and then you pulled the run out from underneath me.

[Vingrask]

Great job, you guys will lock the discussion.

[TheRevanchist27]

Not to rain on your parade, but if revenge was nerfed for the same reason(s) that he held then, regardless of whether or not the devs even heard him, his opinion was vindicated and proven correct.

There's many a times where I've stated quite clearly that the Devs also have stated (During Closed Alpha and Beta) that revenge was BUFFED to act as a counter to gank-squad meta and promote more duels and "honorable" gameplay.

They've flipped on this issue twice now. They are flip-flopping, which to me says that the Devs have NO IDEA what they are doing, and so are just trying to appease whoever cries loudest on the forums. In several of the podcasts/streams they've hosted, they've all but straight up said that everything from balance to game stability, they take their cue from the forum activity.


After how Ubisoft botched The Division, I'd have thought more people would be skeptical of their capabilities as a Studio rather than throwing about such blind faith and touting "The Devs support my opinion" as a credible line.