I ain't no snitch! hahaha He'll get himself banned if he continues his current trajectory of becoming more & more of a nuisance, just like all those fundamentals before him... Of his 5 posts I saw that 3 of them were literally a triple post with the same copy & pasted reply, so he's on his way to ban city... I'll just let that run it's course...Originally Posted by Viragoxv535 Go to original post
how is fighting a cult who has appropriated a religion going against that religion and the last supper is one of the most commonly reproduced paintings in history and was painted by someone who was not even particularly religious and was in fact someone who was by many accounts bi sexual good luck in your campaign thoughOriginally Posted by abhishekvaid13 Go to original post
We've had these incursions before, forget trying to use rationality, they'll dismiss it and continue to reiterate what they believe is their point.Originally Posted by Gr4nt8r0dy Go to original post
Friends, may be he is not troll.......I mean that "against christianity" poster. May be he is realy believe what he sais. I feel sorry for such people and pity. Moderators, I suppose he should not be banned yet. Only some malicious troll can be banned. Who deliberately wish evil and spoil communication. But not some naive believer. And it will be not right to ban everyone who has another point of view. It will demonstrate our weakness only. With our head held high we have to answer all calls!
Originally Posted by Gr4nt8r0dy Go to original post![]()
One more suggestions! Developers, don't afraid of attacking on your game! Be brave! Listen to your heart and do what you think is necessary! Gamers sometimes may give you good advices but you should have your own vision of the game! You are creators! Gamers, in the majority, don't know what they want. Pay sometimes attention to their advices....but your vision is above all! Be always ahead! It's like........Can you imagine Michelangelo or Rafael asking the crowd how they should paint? No! They just painted......and we are still enjoing their masterpieces! So are you........You are "Michelangelo and Rafael"s of modern time.......Make your creation for people to enjoy for ages!
based on what i read in this forum they do that and then people wine that the game is to easy and not realistick enuff or there isn't enough players on the multiplayerOriginally Posted by GameGuru2018 Go to original post
Originally Posted by Gr4nt8r0dy Go to original post![]()
I need to weigh in here a bit.Originally Posted by x2-darren Go to original post
On point 4, gun jams do not make the game play slower. Perhaps that's not what you really were trying to say. Far Cry 2 does require more effort (meaning, "player participation") than subsequent releases that have much more automation built in. This is actually something many of us miss of late. It is not all that exciting to watch animations where you could actually be controlling the action if only the game were programmed that way. Personally I consider the animations a cheap shortcut aimed at curtailing game development costs.
On point 5, do you really want a game that is one part tactical combat sim and one part hobby/hunting? Doesn't it strike you as a little off that you might be in the middle of a life and death mission to save some innocent people from the thugs in the cult and then out the blue decide, "Hey, I think I'll go hunting now." I mean hunting in a combat game is like putting a game of hopscotch in the middle of a street you need to run across quickly to avoid snipers. It just doesn't fit in (same thing for hobbies). My point here is think of the overall context of the game...the big picture. Keep in mind a lot of the activities in Far Cry 3 and 4 are there to give the player something to do at random because it's a sandbox game and content was needed in such a big fictional world. That's why most of the activities have nothing to do with the story, goals or the missions. It's just filler.
I hope this is taken as constructive criticism. I mean no offense.