It seems like this video represents about half the pks playing this game. | Forums

[Celasunnn]

Doesn't understand his classes max punishes? Check.

For some reason thinks he is amazing? Check.

Most of his attacks are flickered ZA or a light in the direction he always flickers? Check.

Talks smack after losing? Check.

Video courtesy of Sypher.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YcO19kfoTg

youtube has been deactivated.
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content?

Also SypherPK, your point is?(Not even releated to Peacekeer that's one thing i'm sure of)

[Netcode_err_404]

youtube has been deactivated.
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content?

Also SypherPK, your point is?(Not even releated to Peacekeer that's one thing i'm sure of)

I don't see the point honestly, Warlord is as broken as pk's. Is not a mistery. I'd dare to say are even worse especially if played in full turtle mode.

That GB reaches are insane.

Not to mention the damagem the superarmor and his feats.

[bananaflow2017]

Maybe a little bit offtopic but:
Do you think the pk got much weaker on console? It feels like they do pretty much the same and it still fells like her lights are faster than my guard switch...
I know it's cool her lights have a bigger recovery in blocking, but actually they just feint a heavy top and do theire lights right or Left and it feels still impossible to fallow her lights.
Someone exp like me or should is just git gud XD?

[CoyoteXStarrk]

Maybe a little bit offtopic but:
Do you think the pk got much weaker on console? It feels like they do pretty much the same and it still fells like her lights are faster than my guard switch...
I know it's cool her lights have a bigger recovery in blocking, but actually they just feint a heavy top and do theire lights right or Left and it feels still impossible to fallow her lights.
Someone exp like me or should is just git gud XD?

Speaking as someone who has been spending ALOT of time on the Conqueror to prove a point the PK is STILL a viciously OP and no skill required class.

- R1 spam is still 100% viable

- Her Dodge R2 while not being as damaging as before is still a perfect counter to pretty much any kind of attack from any of the larger classes

- Her GB spam stab is still completely ridiculous. Not damage wise. Just the endless GB spam until you mess up and given how hit and miss GB still is its frustrating as hell.

- Her ZA spam is still alive and well. God help you if you run into a PK who alternates between GB, R1 spam and ZA spam.


If you took the word mindless spam and transformed it into a character it would be a PK. It would be the PeaceKeeperest PeaceKeeper that ever Kept any Peace.

[TheRevanchist27]

Pretty sure I know the answer but I just wanna double check.

You are saying that the PK BEFORE she was nerfed was totally fine and not all all OP?


Please say yes lol

Dude, don't lead me with a question that has nothing to do with anything I've said.

If you have reading comprehension issues, that's your deal, but you can re-read what I said, word for word.

[CoyoteXStarrk]

Dude, don't lead me with a question that has nothing to do with anything I've said.

If you have reading comprehension issues, that's your deal, but you can re-read what I said, word for word.

Okay if you don't wanna answer the question thats fine.


Also when you said "the PK wasn't that good" I thought you meant the PK as a class wasn't that good.Also in my defense its very easy to assume you mean ludicrous things due to the various claims and things you have said in the past.

[TheRevanchist27]

Okay if you don't wanna answer the question thats fine.


Also when you said "the PK wasn't that good" I thought you meant the PK as a class wasn't that good.Also in my defense its very easy to assume you mean ludicrous things due to the various claims and things you have said in the past.

I don't say anything "ludicrous", I say exactly what I mean.

Just because you don't agree with things I do say or understand what it is that's said does not mean that what is said is inherently wrong, false, or incorrect.


What you choose to infer from those words is your own issue. However what was stated is the PK player wasn't that good, lost a lot, and Sypher just managed to complain about it constantly, making him look like an arsehole.

[CoyoteXStarrk]

I don't say anything "ludicrous", I say exactly what I mean.

Just because you don't agree with things I do say or understand what it is that's said does not mean that what is said is inherently wrong, false, or incorrect.

You claimed that you could sue Ubisoft if they banned you for violating their terms of service and claimed you could file a class action lawsuit against them if you wanted to.


You also claimed that you are not obliged to follow the terms of service because and I am directly quoting you on this


"I didn't sign anything. No lawyers were present"

lu·di·crous
ˈlo͞odəkrəs/
adjective
so foolish, unreasonable, or out of place as to be amusing; ridiculous.

So yes you have said things that many other people on this forum and myself would call ludicrous.

[TheRevanchist27]

You claimed that you could sue Ubisoft if they banned you for violating their terms of service and claimed you could file a class action lawsuit against them if you wanted to.


You also claimed that you are not obliged to follow the terms of service because and I am directly quoting you on this


"I didn't sign anything. No lawyers were present"





So yes you have said things that many other people on this forum and myself would call ludicrous.

I have thoroughly explained to you that in many countries, states, nations, political blocs, etc. that there are laws that exist "consumer protections and rights". You have a right to your day in court. If you feel that you have been treated in an unjust manner. There are several high profile cases showing that "Terms of Service" and "EULA" type "agreements" are anything but, and don't fit within the definitions of legal conduct in cases where they were not upheld.

Hell Ubisoft could be on the hook for false advertising and "bait and switch" tactics if one had the time and fortune to file a suit over it.



Just because you are legally ignorant of your own rights and how the legal system works, especially when it comes to conducting business in an ethical manner, does not make my statements ludicrous.


I would hope that would be the last time I have to explain it to you, though you've shown to have issues with reading comprehension in the past, so who knows?

[CoyoteXStarrk]

I have thoroughly explained to you that in many countries, states, nations, political blocs, etc. that there are laws that exist "consumer protections and rights". You have a right to your day in court. If you feel that you have been treated in an unjust manner. There are several high profile cases showing that "Terms of Service" and "EULA" type "agreements" are anything but, and don't fit within the definitions of legal conduct in cases where they were not upheld.

Hell Ubisoft could be on the hook for false advertising and "bait and switch" tactics if one had the time and fortune to file a suit over it.



Just because you are legally ignorant of your own rights and how the legal system works, especially when it comes to conducting business in an ethical manner, does not make my statements ludicrous.


I would hope that would be the last time I have to explain it to you, though you've shown to have issues with reading comprehension in the past, so who knows?

The fact you STILL think you are in the right is breathtakingly hilarious to me.


It reminds me of the YouTube Vids where you see a kid trying to explain to his parents how something works annd you can see in there eyes that in their head what they are saying makes sense. lol


If what you were saying was actually true ever major studio would be out of business. Props though for persevering through obvious holes in your theory instead of just accepting you are wrong.