Most likely not. It seems that they want to cover the face of all their warriors in some shape or form...Originally Posted by MaximusAquilus Go to original post
It's an immersion thing I think. If you can't see their face, it can be "you." I mean... unless you're a dude-bushi, valk-bro, or phallus-keeper. Again I assumed you're a dude but hey... assumptions.Originally Posted by xLeapingLizardx Go to original post
That's a shame, I much prefer the open face design of historical roman helmets.Originally Posted by xLeapingLizardx Go to original post
![]()
Historically the late era Romans were very much like Knights. Hell some say that the tradition of Knights came from the Romans. Historically the modern concept of the Knight came from Charlemagne, however he had to get his concepts from somewhere, right?Originally Posted by TheMalakith Go to original post![]()
also it means they don't have to animate mouths and facial expressionsOriginally Posted by sgtpickles Go to original post![]()
I think the concept behind covering the majority of the face of our heroes is that it makes them much more mysterious and menacing. It makes it feel a bit more immersive without having us give you a predefined face for your centurion. This could all change in the future though - who knows?
But in the meantime, if you need to put a face to the hero...
Disclaimer - I've never seen it so no idea if it's good or bad ;p
New heroes and DLC drops May 16th!Originally Posted by Moondyne_MC Go to original post
Hero teasers -![]()