Revenge got nerfed. | Forums

[Tydeelee]

There's a military equation called "Lanchester's Laws", which according to it, if you're outnumbered 4 to 1 = as in the 1v4 situations you meet in "ganks", in order to overcome that numbers difference your combat efficiency needs to be 16 times higher than each of those 4 individuals. This is called "Lanchester's Square Law."

While Lanchester's Law isn't an absolute, its considered a starting point to coming up with objective calculations concerning military estimates of combat in regards to attrition -- how efficiently people are killed, and therefore how much force you need to concentrate to win with maximum efficiency.


Hence, as a very general rule of thumb, assuming similar skill/gear level

1. When in 1v2, your chances of survival is not 50%. It's 25%, and you need to be 4 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance
2. When in 1v3, your chances of survival is not 33%. It's 11.1%, and you need to be 9 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance
3. When in 1v4, your chances of survival is not 25%. It's 6.25%, and you need to be 16 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance


So, what kind of a "middle point" do you want with a situation where your likelihood of death is supposed to be around 88.9% ~ 93.75%? Conversely, the "you could fight off ganks" or "you can make them think twice before ganking" excuse is by itself a proof that the old revenge was so powerful as to foil a 88.9% ~ 93.75% chance of the attackers to win. It was THAT unbalanced.

Damn man winchester **** you
And the game too what a Fu**
Stop crying its ok they dont gonna buff it!
Now be happy and go play!

Shiii*

[Tydeelee]

LOL! Excellent argument, you revenge folk. I think they should invite you to TED lectures!!

Dude we are here just to give our opinion to Ubisoft what the heck do you want everytime we are discussing about Revenge you are here to su ck a** ?!
Who do you think you are?
Sincerely just stfu

[Tydeelee]

And I'm giving opinions to your (bad) opinions. Freedom of speech works both ways, son.

Only thing is just that NoBody wants to hear your opinion!
You Told 1000times now That revenge is fine ok Now go do what you gotta do!
We are talkin to ubisoft with feedback and suggestion!

You are NO One that acctually have any Right to decide what how and Would be good for the game!
Give your own feedback but stop to suc k *** on every one who is Feedbacking on that Chiuaua Revenge Espacially in terms of Defense it is weak!

The ***k you think you are?
Any blowin time anyone who is feedbacking the bull **** on that revenge you act Like you acctually Are an Developer of For Honor!

I dont hate on you man we are just giving our feedback so enjoy your game and your life!
Without suc*ing *** please

[CitizenPuddi]

Only thing is just that NoBody wants to hear your opinion!
You Told 1000times now That revenge is fine ok Now go do what you gotta do!
We are talkin to ubisoft with feedback and suggestion!

You are NO One that acctually have any Right to decide what how and Would be good for the game!
Give your own feedback but stop to suc k *** on every one who is Feedbacking on that Chiuaua Revenge Espacially in terms of Defense it is weak!

The ***k you think you are?
Any blowin time anyone who is feedbacking the bull **** on that revenge you act Like you acctually Are an Developer of For Honor!

I dont hate on you man we are just giving our feedback so enjoy your game and your life!
Without suc*ing *** please

it's truly amazing

i've always read that attacking the person making the argument, as opposed to the argument itself, is the most reliable way to destroy one's own credibility

interesting to watch this effect play out in real time

[Tydeelee]

it's truly amazing

i've always read that attacking the person making the argument, as opposed to the argument itself, is the most reliable way to destroy one's own credibility

interesting to watch this effect play out in real time

We are arguing with Ubisoft!
And you are keeping it while too far everytime explaining things winchester and all the things you talking about!
Its your opinion so tell your opinion to Ubisoft why it would be better to let revenge be like now!

[CitizenPuddi]

We are arguing with Ubisoft!
And you are keeping it while too far everytime explaining things winchester and all the things you talking about!
Its your opinion so tell your opinion to Ubisoft why it would be better to let revenge be like now!

thats not how discussion forums work

if you dont want discussion, just e-mail ubisoft directly

::edited to add::

why do you keep saying winchester?

[Tydeelee]

Ridicolous Trolls

[CitizenPuddi]

Ridicolous Trolls

are we trolls because we disagree and voice our disagreement or...?

not following that line of thinking

winchester

[CaIamityKey1]

1. When in 1v2, your chances of survival is not 50%. It's 25%, and you need to be 4 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance
2. When in 1v3, your chances of survival is not 33%. It's 11.1%, and you need to be 9 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance
3. When in 1v4, your chances of survival is not 25%. It's 6.25%, and you need to be 16 times more skilled to have 50:50 chance

So, the fact that I always change target while in revenge and feinting doesn't make any sence? And, yes my KDA on Lawbringer in Deathmatch modes is more that 7.
Still cannot win any.

[Harry_S._Houle]

Revenge is fine now. It´s a small help against more players. That was the main idea behind this mechanic and hey it works as intended. If u r still butthurt play dragonball xenoverse or naruto ultimate ninja storm. They have tons of i win super sayan buttons.