So who thinks we will see the "new" FH at the start of s2? | Forums

[cragar212]

Incase anyone doesn't know a couple weeks ago some top players went to Ubisoft to give feedback on upcoming changes.

Apparently one of the streamers stated talking about what he saw on his stream (Im guessing he was under a NDA)

Allegedly they played an alpha version of the game that was offence based and extremely fun. Apparently zerker was godlike.

So do you guys think it will make it out for s2?

Do you think it will breath some life back into the game?

[Mudflaaaps]

I REALLY hope that's true. The defense meta is so awful, I'd love a properly offensive mode.

[Netcode_err_404]

Top players giving feedback ? Well,top players's gameplay/gamestyle is way too different from regular players one, hope they remembered that when giving some feedback

[CaptainPwnet]

I REALLY hope that's true. The defense meta is so awful, I'd love a properly offensive mode.

What difference would it make for you? You're still going to run on here and cry every time you lose to something you have 0 understanding of lol.

[Netcode_err_404]

What difference would it make for you? You're still going to run on here and cry every time you lose to something you have 0 understanding of lol.

For a lot of people losing is not a problem , including myself.

The important is having fun. Something in for honor, is not always possible to have.

[bmason1000]

Allegedly they played an alpha version of the game that was offence based and extremely fun. Apparently zerker was godlike.

I hope this version never, ever, ever sees the light. Not because i don't want offense to be more powerful, but because i don't want a million berserkers running around jumpin on the bandwagon. He's the only character I've ever used and i like that he's still kind of an under dog. Used to be i liked seeing more because people talked s*** on berserker and there weren't a lot of us. Post patch there's gettin to be too many. Where were you guys when berserker was trash, huh? I was swingin axes when you still played warlord. Get out of my house. Get the f*** out.

[Frappenstain]

Defense meta... Even if you remove it, peoples will play defensive. This is a fighting game ffs. You can't expect peoples blindrush and start the fight with top heavy. Stop trying it put into standart gameplay molds. I fight alot of defensive peoples, and always found a way to open them. Feints, dodges, changing places... Just find a good opening moves. Stope exaggeration of mechanics. Defenese, it's a mechanic get over with it, Parry is also a mechanic, get over with it too. Dodges, side attacks, feints,GB's.... There are alot of way to start a fight.

[Draghmar]

Top players giving feedback ? Well,top players's gameplay/gamestyle is way too different from regular players one, hope they remembered that when giving some feedback

Of course they won't...or don't care. Most people tends to force their view so the game be like they want.

[Kraxers]

What difference would it make for you? You're still going to run on here and cry every time you lose to something you have 0 understanding of lol.

Aren't you one of these guys that telling people to "stfup, git gut and game is balanced bs" when they were complaning about an obvious unbalance/mechanical flaw like oni charge exploit? You sure look like them.

[Halvtand]

I for one would welcome the change. A more offensive game sounds a lot more like what the beta and other early tests were like, and those were fun as sh*t.

It does come with the caveat that the defensive classes (Conq, WL, LB, Valk) are not ruined in the process. Except for Valk I believe that these three will be the ultimate losers in a more offensive version of this game.

However, if this is done well. If there is enough reward for players to start throwing out attacks rather than turtle up and go for the parry-GB-heavy over and over again, and at the same time the defensive classes are allowed the ability to block until the cows come home I think this could be a big step in the right direction for the game.