🛈 Announcement
Greetings! Ghost-Recon forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game.
  1. #1

    Narco road gameplay, Highly disappointing

    As the title says, watching narco road gameplay I was able to see the "NEW" weapons that came with narco road. And I am so happy I didn't get my hopes up. those nine "new" weapons are nothing more then re-skins of the ones we already have, an mp7 with white flames and a type 95 with orange flames etc... the outfits! AHAHAHAH what a joke, four ****ty outfits that you can't even change around. And their charging how much? yeah I don't know Ubisoft somethings not right.


    The gameplay is on youtube, just search it up. example : "narco road gameplay"

    some may argue this isn't important, that's fine. But if it's the gameplay your worried about. It's meh, it's ok. Nothing amazing.
     21 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  2. #2
    WOW sounds horribad, clearly there are too many fingers in this pie. This is why having tons of people working on one game is bad. I took my copy back few days ago and havent looked back since. I liked the game but not enough to spend $65 on it so I got a full refund. The dlc is utterly disappointing on every front. TBH thts the main reason I returned my copy again for a full refund. This sint Tom Clancy its GTA in the jungle.
     9 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  3. #3
    Wow, really? 9 new "special" weapons? Oh come on Ubisoft! If the OP is right, enough is enough already. You cannot seriously intend to keep feeding us these "special" guns When we see "NEW WEAPONS" we think new as there aren't similar models in the game. Unless you intend to make all these "special" guns customizable at some point, you're just shoveling horse manure in our face and expecting us to like it. And no, I don't like it.
     5 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by Varakharne Go to original post
    WOW sounds horribad, clearly there are too many fingers in this pie. This is why having tons of people working on one game is bad. I took my copy back few days ago and havent looked back since. I liked the game but not enough to spend $65 on it so I got a full refund. The dlc is utterly disappointing on every front. TBH thts the main reason I returned my copy again for a full refund. This sint Tom Clancy its GTA in the jungle.
    Indeed, the base game is okay but needs a lot of improvement. They **** it over by producing all this dumb dlc that doesn't fit in the world and focus it on the most horrible aspect of the game: driving vehicles. This game could have become a great tactical game which filled a void but instead they try to go for the GTA/Saints Row fanbase and in the process the game turns out to be rubbish.
     7 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  5. #5
    I am glad you guys feel the same. I am so done with this ****! LOL. Thinking about trading the game in soon as well. It's sad really.
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  6. #6
    UBI just tell me the reason why i need to create NEW character? Thats stupid AF you should fire this guy who told you New character and minigame as DLC is OK
     6 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by adriano133 Go to original post
    Indeed, the base game is okay but needs a lot of improvement. They **** it over by producing all this dumb dlc that doesn't fit in the world and focus it on the most horrible aspect of the game: driving vehicles. This game could have become a great tactical game which filled a void but instead they try to go for the GTA/Saints Row fanbase and in the process the game turns out to be rubbish.
    Yea, I've said many times that this game as a whole represents the finely honed Ubisoft open world formula but there are a lot of decisions that really work against that mold. Some of the DLC things like Narco Road for instance, I just cant, I cant ,sorry Ubisoft, I like your games for the most part but you always seem to over do it with miscrotrannies and weird DLC additions. I don't know maybe I am too finicky in my old age these days but for $65 I kinda expect a better deal. I don't want to smear in negativity all the time ,we have enough of that as it is ( the world I mean ) but I wont abide by business decisions that hurt the initial product. That's my 2 cents anyways. Maybe I jsut need to take a break, today of all days I am having a bad day so I probably shouldnt be on a game forum while upset lol.
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  8. #8
    I am sorry, I know i said this in my main post on this thread. But I can't get this through my head. Four non customizable basic, like really plain CIA looking outfits, NINE re skin-ed weapons that we already have, the missions and gameplay is ok at best from what i've seen. And on it's own it cost $14.99 USD, or $30.00 USD for the season pass. what....
     3 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by Varakharne Go to original post
    Yea, I've said many times that this game as a whole represents the finely honed Ubisoft open world formula but there are a lot of decisions that really work against that mold. Some of the DLC things like Narco Road for instance, I just cant, I cant ,sorry Ubisoft, I like your games for the most part but you always seem to over do it with miscrotrannies and weird DLC additions. I don't know maybe I am too finicky in my old age these days but for $65 I kinda expect a better deal. I don't want to smear in negativity all the time ,we have enough of that as it is ( the world I mean ) but I wont abide by business decisions that hurt the initial product. That's my 2 cents anyways. Maybe I jsut need to take a break, today of all days I am having a bad day so I probably shouldnt be on a game forum while upset lol.
    I completely agree, this game showed a lot of potential but Ubisoft is doing their very best to put the game in an early grave. Which is a shame because there are barely any AAA tactical shooters and this game could have done well.

    I just looked at the gameplay and WOW i'm again amazed at how lazy/greedy Ubisoft is. The majority of the new guns are just dumb skins for guns that were already in the game.That was the only part of that piece of **** racing dlc that could've been a bit interesting.

    Really Ubisoft? I keep being amazed at how you guys are so good at disappointing the fanbase again and again.
     8 people found this helpful
    Share this post

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by adriano133 Go to original post
    I completely agree, this game showed a lot of potential but Ubisoft is doing their very best to put the game in an early grave. Which is a shame because there are barely any AAA tactical shooters and this game could have done well.

    I just looked at the gameplay and WOW i'm again amazed at how lazy/greedy Ubisoft is. The majority of the new guns are just dumb skins for guns that were already in the game.That was the only part of that piece of **** racing dlc that could've been a bit interesting.

    Really Ubisoft? I keep being amazed at how you guys are so good at disappointing the fanbase again and again.
    I honestly couldn't of said it better myself! Spot on!
     4 people found this helpful
    Share this post

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... Last ►►