Historically Ubisoft are SLOW to bring in PvP elements into the games for various reasons. At least they committed to adding it for free when it does come, though I empathise if you're close to running out of gameplay in your opinion.Originally Posted by bent_toe Go to original post
They didn't give a release schedule so complaining that its not in the first DLC patch is a little heavy handed.
For as long as they add more tactical pve content im fine without pvp. I doubt pvp is going to be fun in this game anyway, no matter how good theyre going to make it. Specc ops team fighting each other is stupid anyway, id rather see more pve missions. Although realistc ones, not this narco road **** that makes tom clancy rotate in his grave
where do you see an IGN article about this? link?Originally Posted by bent_toe Go to original post
Also, my guess is that stretching a very much wanted free DLC is a good thing for UBI. people wont sell the game so fast if they will have a reason to hold on to it for longer as they wait the PVP.
Originally Posted by topeira1980 Go to original post
http://nordic.ign.com/m/ghost-recon-...etails-reveale
Watch video or scroll down to read it.
The whole point of PVP is to give something for people to do so that they dont sell the game. In my eyes, PVE gets people to buy a game and play them for a month or 2. PVP keeps them coming back.Originally Posted by topeira1980 Go to original post
Not everyone is like that.Originally Posted by meathead_79 Go to original post
Until Last Stand came out, The Division didnt have a true PVP game mode. But to be honest,that came out so late that I think the player base was already too small to matter.Originally Posted by niempe-67 Go to original post
Does that mean all the Rogues left the Dark Zone? If so, I might return to that game in the future.Originally Posted by meathead_79 Go to original post