Exploits need to be removed before anymore balance patches roll out. | Forums

[DrExtrem]

Exploits need to be removed before anymore balance patches roll out.

All together with the "players" who exploited.

[nagya12356]

Exploits need to be removed before anymore balance patches roll out.

All together with the "players" who exploited.

Amen to that. I mean i was fighting a guy in 2v2 round one beat his *** not flawlessly but he realized that i can parry him. Round 2 starts to use that bs tactic I got rekt. Cause when he uses that **** it is not about reflexes it is about 50/50 and if you want to play a game which is about 50/50 and not reflexes then go and play heads or tails

[DrExtrem]

50/50s are cheap but not exploits.

I fought a guy, who was not bad but i still beat him in two duels, because I was able to parry his heavy attacks. What did he do? He switched to orochi, started spamming light attacks until he was out of stamina and guess what? He abused the glitch, that prevented him from falling on his arse. He did not do it once and be accident and I did not even cheese him. That gut deserves a perma-ban.

If you can not counter guard break, it is your problem.

[MisterGuyMan]

It's quite funny how people can't think for themselves. So basically I used actual examples and even history itself to prove that exploits don't have to be a big deal and all people can reply with are "But but... the developers said so!" That's not an argument. It's an appeal to authority fallacy.

Look at the facts. Exploits have been used in fighting game tournaments for decades. I argue with actual facts and logic. The other side apparently is arguing merely from a position as Ubisoft sycophants. I guess Ubisoft also right for all the abusive heat stats right? That's why appeal to authority is bad. Think for yourself.

[Vingrask]

It's quite funny how people can't think for themselves. So basically I used actual examples and even history itself to prove that exploits don't have to be a big deal and all people can reply with are "But but... the developers said so!" That's not an argument. It's an appeal to authority fallacy.

Look at the facts. Exploits have been used in fighting game tournaments for decades. I argue with actual facts and logic. The other side apparently is arguing merely from a position as Ubisoft sycophants. I guess Ubisoft also right for all the abusive heat stats right? That's why appeal to authority is bad. Think for yourself.

You are deluded if you think these kind of exploits can be compared to the accident combo was. Funny is how you are trying defend something which are outside of the skill game we want. Do a trick with your mouse to screw your enemy isn't skill. Let's go to a cassino and allow the table hide cards because they are good enough with this trick. Well, it is just an exploit and we should deal with it...

Combo required skill, timing, and wasn't a game breaker, reason why the devs didn't tried fix it, but let in game for players find for themselves. Wasn't something that somebody found which even the devs didn't know about. And if the workers who created this **** said thay don't want this kind of trick on their game, this damn trick shouldn't be on the game.

[MisterGuyMan]

You are deluded if you think these kind of exploits can be compared to the accident combo was. Funny is how you are trying defend something which are outside of the skill game we want. Do a trick with your mouse to screw your enemy isn't skill. Let's go to a cassino and allow the table hide cards because they are good enough with this trick. Well, it is just an exploit and we should deal with it...

Combo required skill, timing, and wasn't a game breaker, reason why the devs didn't tried fix it, but let in game for players find for themselves. Wasn't something that somebody found which even the devs didn't know about. And if the workers who created this **** said thay don't want this kind of trick on their game, this damn trick shouldn't be on the game.

You're blatantly obfuscation the issue. Flicker is a 50/50 mechanic. That's it. Combos aren't a gamebreaker. OK. So? Do you know what else isn't a game breaker? 50/50 mechanics. You have literally not made a single point why a 50/50 mechanic is gamebreaking outside of "it's a exploit therefore it's not intended." Sorry to point out the obvious but just because something isn't intended is not evidence that it breaks the game.

Your casino example also illustrates why your argument makes no sense because flicker is available to everyone. Moreover flicker helps offense and even with flicker, defense reigns supreme. So your example actually undermines your argument that flicker breaks the game.

Your appeal to authority argument is literally a named fallacy so your insistence on relying on it just highlights how illogical you want to be. Ubisoft also believes it's OK to have 108 gear veterans play against a new player with no gear and no experience. I disagree. Your logical fallacy means we should all just follow what Ubisoft does without thinking for ourselves. God forbid we not act like blind sheep following around a company whose first priority is to take our money first and balance a game second. Sheesh.

[Vingrask]

blatantly... obfuscation ...literally... authority argument... fallacy ... illogical ... logical fallacy... thinking for ourselves... blind sheep... take our money...

Hahahaha. I'm out.

[MisterGuyMan]

Hahahaha. I'm out.

Of course you're out. Did Ubisoft forget to update your programming? It's always funny seeing people have to actually confront their fallacies. Your God Ubisoft isnt always right. Run away now. LOL

[Remnancy1]

Seeing as how Ubisoft is in charge they are right because its their game and if they say something is not supposed to be here thats the end of the discussion

[MisterGuyMan]

Seeing as how Ubisoft is in charge they are right because its their game and if they say something is not supposed to be here thats the end of the discussion

LOL. So that's why we all agree that letting 108 gear veterans beat up on new players with no gear is totally the most balanced gameplay mechanic ever. Ubisoft designed it that way so they must be right!

Seriously? "Ubisoft said so" is no excuse to stop thinking for yourself.