🛈 Announcement
Greetings! The For Honor forums are now archived and accessible in read-only mode, please go to the new platform to discuss the game
  1. #21
    Originally Posted by Mudflaaaps Go to original post
    Is pointing out an obvious design flaw crying? No, it's constructive criticism. If people didn't complain about broken game mechanics then nothing would change.

    He killed several of us, but obviously as it was 4v1 we revived each other.

    A peacekeeper could never take on 4 people, because she can't regenerate health. Peacekeepers aren't even that powerful imo.

    Yes, revenge being nerfed/fixed may help a bit.
    However, even without revenge this guy would be able to regenerate his health from every defend (which is stupidly easy with a conqueror), resulting in a pointless fight.

    I mean I know for honor isn't the most realistic game in the world, but really? Gaining health from being hit? What kind of backwards logic is that?
    I really think you complain about the wrong things in the wrong way.
    That perk you talk about is not by far the worst thing of the conqueror and yet you make a world out of it. Shugoki can oneshot you and regenerate about 1/3 of his health with his demons embrace (not to mention his broken traking system) and thats seems ok for you, but hey, the perk to regen health on the conqueror on each block is OP...

    Now let me ask you a few things:
    Did you try to feint?
    Did you try to guard break? (is the easyest thing to do when he is on full block mode btw)
    Did you try to parry?
    Did you try to stop spaming?

    In case you did not know, Conqueror (thanks to his perks and his pasive habilities) is the most tanky heroe of the game (huge defense and huge life) and his rol is precisely to be able to deal against various oponents at the same time while he protects A or C until the reinforcements from his team arrives. If in the other side your team is dumb enough to spam at a high level conqueror, then you really deserve to die in the way you did.

    At this point i really think you would probably have died as well if instead of a conqueror you were fighting against a decent dueler player with a Raider for example. But there is something im not sure about. In that case, would you open a post complaining about the Raider´s Zone atack being OP?

    As i have sayed before, there are many things wrong with the Conqueror. MANY. He is broken in many ways and he really deserve a whole remake (not a nerf) of his habilities and moveset, but in my opinion what you complain about just shows your lack of experience.

    And please, forgive my spelling. English is not my native language.
    Share this post

  2. #22
    I agree.

    Simply nerfing shield bash will not fix the conq, it will make him useless because its all his got. He's a really poorly designed character, he needs an overhaul.
    Share this post

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by Bob__Gnarly Go to original post
    I agree.

    Simply nerfing shield bash will not fix the conq, it will make him useless because its all his got. He's a really poorly designed character, he needs an overhaul.
    This.
    I like a lot the apparence of conqueror so i play him at start but after some time I stop playing him cause is so boring and limited.
    All you can do aganist good players is SB > Light and a feint with allblock if i feel lucky.
    For the rest wait and hope for a GB.

    (you can glich the charged heavy, but i dont want to support this style of play.)
    Share this post